From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866C9C433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560A022513 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732274AbhAYUu5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:50:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732400AbhAYUuj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:50:39 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE4FC061573 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id f2so11809065ljp.11 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SOrvL3WE9CXeeQC1DryhJmY7YvE6n4IGLTv5pZc3Drs=; b=avfzDpjVYh+sznZbJ0EBB2/etLvBbrqgMwIWnYNKJX59fXhDMsAIWDA0vpRnYQXU5w l0OqTjaGROJmkRILZq+nYxfRP0Ze7uMO6V1aEWx+mOI1oIw6dzF/oAUnXOFtkEPl0+DC NlTqVJJfGkRXkAeM3Ab4/8qUFz0xUJiyp0kGc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SOrvL3WE9CXeeQC1DryhJmY7YvE6n4IGLTv5pZc3Drs=; b=J6E3y6E1ogV/zkUKpQjcgjilU1oaxNEkBr8QusrjyQKG7JwGHt3/Nhdpu7rGodrIW/ Ibz7W3NsQH5HUn41AlOufm4IO/ZP8fIo4vO1YqE/ZRAMmqEsNseHf3AnveLR0pwZCXpa jg2/E1112mrafSmM1gXQ2erqKjqMhTEfJKhklVyZgxTysUwvzrfG3kh9b7GLhc/S46UX rKClxjMjVifcQH3viselo/cM+bBTsK2KT1uep4kE4eLAazf245zSylfxKD9fHDCngJ8M 1HqTtsFdygUE6MLLZR5kBCC9UyTmQMlSmwClxVV+gVNpn6Ay6kdmPubZTFxdRK9hyWIw wmVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dWi2iLpxjBusSQs3r0jRms597ZPNP3iXdrgHct9Nw7vqo2E04 5XoodNzl2nGL+Zvt4O+UgZux73++Yb5Q9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLuXC2cerXmgHF2L1H9uinN/tRjrBCRHvsQTaZTbGIcEMRwHW3oBQOhkx6sc7wtRtb0GWcjw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6f05:: with SMTP id k5mr1026890ljc.400.1611607797456; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (mail-lf1-f53.google.com. [209.85.167.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm1372331ljg.119.2021.01.25.12.49.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id o10so19745125lfl.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a19:c14c:: with SMTP id r73mr974362lff.201.1611607796008; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> In-Reply-To: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:49:39 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 To: Chris Wilson Cc: Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40) > > Mike Rapoport (3): > ... > > mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout > > We have half a dozen or so different machines in CI that are silently > failing to boot, that we believe is bisected to this patch. That commit reverts cleanly - so if you can verify that reverting it fixes your CI machines, I think that that's the right thing to do for now, unless Mike can figure out some obvious "Duh!" moment from your working dmesg. Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")? Linus