Re: [PATCH] lib/string: Bring optimized memcmp from glibc

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 1:13 PM David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> adding a memcmp_large that compares by native words or u64 could be
> the best option.

Yeah, we could just special-case that one place.

But see the patches I sent out - I think we can get the best of both worlds.

A small and simple memcmp() that is good enough and not the
_completely_ stupid thing we have now.

The second patch I sent out even gets the mutually aligned case right.

Of course, the glibc code also ended up unrolling things a bit, but
honestly, the way it did it was too disgusting for words.

And if it really turns out that the unrolling makes a big difference -
although I doubt it's meaningful with any modern core - I can add a
couple of lines to that simple patch I sent out to do that too.
Without getting the monster that is that glibc code.

Of course, my patch depends on the fact that "get_unaligned()" is
cheap on all CPU's that really matter, and that caches aren't
direct-mapped any more. The glibc code seems to be written for a world
where registers are cheap, unaligned accesses are prohibitively
expensive, and unrolling helps because L1 caches are direct-mapped and
you really want to do chunking to not get silly way conflicts.

If old-style Sparc or MIPS was our primary target, that would be one
thing. But it really isn't.

              Linus