linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Getting weird TPM error after rebasing my tree to security/next-general
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:04:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whO_TqDzQXSuSbgyZdVj9qeyRSxpjWXBQUWgvKGT2dnug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131204510.GA354@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:45 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> I understand what you mean. Just surprised that this hasn't failed
> before to anyone (the same driver has been even successfully used
> on ARM64 with TrustZone based fTPM implementation). It has been in
> for three years now.

Just to finish this thread off: it turns out that both ARM and ARM64
worked fine, because neither did a memcpy(), but had explicit IO copy
routines.

And in those explicit routines, 32-bit ARM did only byte accesses, and
64-bit ARM did 8-byte accesses for the bulk transfer part, but byte
accesses for the unaligned head and tail of the IO area.

So I think it's all good. x86 used to work by luck (either because all
machines that used that TPM chip always had ERMS, or because the
people who didn't have it never cared), and ARM just worked because it
would never do unaligned IO accesses anyway (well, I guess you can
force them with "readl()" on an unaligned address, but then you just
have yourself to blame).

           Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18 14:25 Getting weird TPM error after rebasing my tree to security/next-general Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-18 22:09 ` James Bottomley
2019-01-20 16:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22  1:02     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22  2:58       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-22 13:29         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22 18:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-23 15:36             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-23 18:43               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-29 13:20                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 12:26                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 16:04                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 17:06                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 17:43                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 18:47                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 18:35                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 18:51                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 18:52                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 19:10                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 19:47                                 ` Winkler, Tomas
2019-02-01  8:12                                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 20:07                                 ` Winkler, Tomas
2019-01-31 20:47                                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 21:58                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-31 23:31                                     ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-02-01 11:40                                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-31 20:45                             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-01 18:04                               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-02-04 11:58                                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-23 20:11               ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=whO_TqDzQXSuSbgyZdVj9qeyRSxpjWXBQUWgvKGT2dnug@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).