From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Kowalski <bl0pbl33p@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Nagarathnam Muthusamy <nagarathnam.muthusamy@oracle.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] pid: add pidfd_open()
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:18:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi39-Ozq5zb22s7ZB4J_Nd6nTwE_9A3+qjp5nCY4iTSEg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401000937.GG2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 5:09 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Ugh... Which vfsmount would you have to go with it?
I'd literally just do a lookup of "/proc" in the current root
directory in the lookup() function for that special pseudo-dentry.
If it's not mounted, or not a /proc filesystem, screw it.
> Except that we never let unattached _directory_ dentries out - if
> we can't reattach them to the tree, open-by-handle will tell you to
> take a hike.
Absolutely. Which is why I said it's _conceptually_ similar to the alias lookup.
And I suspect we can even use some of the same practical logic, but
it's definitely not _exactly_ the same. This thing very much involves
magic hooking into the lookup() function (but we then have to look up
the alias not for the path we're looking up, but for the _parent_
we're looking that path up in, which is very different from the normal
case).
> It's more than a tiny bit too clever for mine...
Fair enough. The whole "just do the whole lookup at pidfd creation
time" is certainly a whole lot simpler.
> Al, back to normal life and digging through several flamefests from
> hell...
Yeah, I would like to see the actual aio.c pull request and the
use-after-free fixes. All the patches look fine, I just don't have the
final end result..
And that takes precedence anyway. Right now the "open_pidfd()" is a
future discussion.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 15:54 [PATCH v2 0/5] pid: add pidfd_open() Christian Brauner
2019-03-29 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Make anon_inodes unconditional Christian Brauner
2019-03-29 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] pid: add pidfd_open() Christian Brauner
2019-03-29 23:45 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-29 23:55 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 11:53 ` Jürg Billeter
2019-03-30 14:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 14:51 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-03-29 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] signal: support pidfd_open() with pidfd_send_signal() Christian Brauner
2019-03-29 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] signal: PIDFD_SIGNAL_TID threads via pidfds Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 1:06 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-30 1:22 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 1:34 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 1:42 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-29 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tests: add pidfd_open() tests Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] pid: add pidfd_open() Linus Torvalds
2019-03-30 16:11 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-03-30 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-30 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-31 1:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-03-31 2:34 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-31 4:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-03-31 4:46 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-31 14:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-31 15:05 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-31 15:21 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-03-31 15:33 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-03-30 16:19 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-30 16:34 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-03-30 16:38 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-30 17:12 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-30 17:37 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 17:50 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-03-30 17:52 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 17:59 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-03-30 18:02 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 18:00 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-31 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-31 21:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-31 21:10 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-31 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-31 22:03 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-31 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-31 22:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-01 0:52 ` Jann Horn
2019-04-01 8:47 ` Yann Droneaud
2019-04-01 10:03 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-03-31 23:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 0:09 ` Al Viro
2019-04-01 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-04-01 0:21 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-01 6:37 ` Al Viro
2019-04-01 6:41 ` Al Viro
2019-03-31 22:03 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-04-01 2:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-01 11:40 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-04-01 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 15:47 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-01 15:55 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-04-01 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 16:13 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-04-01 19:42 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-01 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 21:58 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-04-01 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 22:34 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-04-01 16:07 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-04-01 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 16:27 ` Jonathan Kowalski
2019-04-01 16:21 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-04-01 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-01 16:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2019-04-01 17:00 ` David Laight
2019-04-01 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-02 11:03 ` Florian Weimer
2019-04-01 16:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-01 12:04 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-01 13:43 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-31 21:19 ` Christian Brauner
2019-03-30 16:37 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wi39-Ozq5zb22s7ZB4J_Nd6nTwE_9A3+qjp5nCY4iTSEg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bl0pbl33p@gmail.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=nagarathnam.muthusamy@oracle.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).