linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Hang on wireless removal..
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:41:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj0QUaYcLHKG=_fw65NqhGbqvnU958SkHak9mg9qNwR+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

So I think there's something wrong with wireless networking, and
(likely) in particular turning off wireless. And I think the problem
came in this merge window, because now my machine hangs on shutdown.

My new desktop is otherwise working fine, but it has some unnecessary
wireless capability on the motherboard, in the form of a Intel Wi-Fi 6
AX200 module that I don't use (since I end up using wired gig ethernet
instead).

And while debugging the shutdown hang (symptom: systemd waits forever
for NetworkManager and WPA supplicant), I turned off the WiFi.

And what do you know, things went all sideways.

They went sideways because everything that wants the rtnl lock seems
to just hang.

Example:

  kworker/57:2    D    0  1592      2 0x80004080
  Workqueue: events_power_efficient reg_check_chans_work [cfg80211]
  Call Trace:
   __schedule+0x30b/0x4b0
   ? schedule+0x77/0xa0
   ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
   ? __mutex_lock+0x264/0x410
   ? psi_group_change+0x44/0x260
   ? reg_check_chans_work+0x1d/0x300 [cfg80211]
   ? __switch_to_asm+0x42/0x70
   ? process_one_work+0x1fa/0x3f0
   ? worker_thread+0x25d/0x480
   ? kthread+0x121/0x130
   ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? kthread_blkcg+0x30/0x30
   ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  kworker/60:2    D    0  1926      2 0x80004000
  Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_verify_work
  Call Trace:
   __schedule+0x30b/0x4b0
   ? schedule+0x77/0xa0
   ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
   ? __mutex_lock+0x264/0x410
   ? addrconf_verify_work+0xa/0x20
   ? process_one_work+0x1fa/0x3f0
   ? worker_thread+0x25d/0x480
   ? kthread+0x121/0x130
   ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? kthread_blkcg+0x30/0x30
   ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  NetworkManager  D    0  4329      1 0x00004000
  Call Trace:
   __schedule+0x30b/0x4b0
   ? schedule+0x77/0xa0
   ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
   ? __mutex_lock+0x264/0x410
   ? __netlink_dump_start+0xa7/0x300
   ? rtnl_dellink+0x3c0/0x3c0
   ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x375/0x3d0
   ? poll_freewait+0x35/0xa0
   ? do_sys_poll+0x58f/0x5f0
   ? rtnl_dellink+0x3c0/0x3c0
   ? __ia32_compat_sys_ppoll_time64+0x120/0x120
   ? ip_output+0x6a/0xd0
   ? ip_mc_finish_output+0x120/0x120
   ? avc_has_perm+0x34/0xa0
   ? rtnetlink_bind+0x30/0x30
   ? netlink_rcv_skb+0xfb/0x130
   ? netlink_unicast+0x1bf/0x2e0
   ? netlink_sendmsg+0x385/0x410
   ? __sys_sendto+0x21f/0x230
   ? move_addr_to_user+0x97/0xc0
   ? alloc_file_pseudo+0x9b/0xd0
   ? sock_alloc_file+0xc4/0x100
   ? __x64_sys_sendto+0x22/0x30
   ? do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xd0
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

and perhaps most interestingly, wpa_supplicant is waiting for some of
those workqueues that are waiting for the lock:

  wpa_supplicant  D    0  2162      1 0x00004000
  Call Trace:
   __schedule+0x30b/0x4b0
   ? schedule+0x77/0xa0
   ? schedule_timeout+0x22/0x150
   ? ttwu_queue+0xf4/0x120
   ? wait_for_common+0xac/0x110
   ? __flush_work+0x200/0x230
   ? put_pwq+0x70/0x70
   ? __cfg80211_unregister_wdev+0x95/0x130 [cfg80211]
   ? ieee80211_if_remove+0xa3/0xe0 [mac80211]
   ? ieee80211_del_iface+0xe/0x20 [mac80211]
   ? rdev_del_virtual_intf+0x2b/0xc0 [cfg80211]
   ? genl_rcv_msg+0x451/0x570
   ? genl_unbind+0xb0/0xb0
   ? netlink_rcv_skb+0xfb/0x130
   ? genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
   ? netlink_unicast+0x1bf/0x2e0
   ? netlink_sendmsg+0x385/0x410
   ? ____sys_sendmsg+0x26b/0x290
   ? __sys_sendmsg+0x128/0x180
   ? selinux_socket_setsockopt+0xc3/0xd0
   ? __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0x99/0x290
   ? netlink_setsockopt+0x38/0x4d0
   ? __sys_setsockopt+0x11b/0x1b0
   ? do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xd0
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

which explains why systemd waits for that one too.

So something seems to have never released the rtnl lock.

In fact, I suspect it's exactly that wpa_supplicant itself that
deadlocks on it and holds the rntl lock while it does that
"flush_work()". Which in turn waits for things to go away, but they'll
never go away because they need the rtnl lock. That wpa_supplicant is
holding.

If I were a betting man, I'd suspect it's due to commit 6cd536fe62ef
("cfg80211: change internal management frame registration API"), which
seems to move that

        flush_work(&wdev->mgmt_registrations_update_wk);

into __cfg80211_unregister_wdev(). But honestly, that's just a guess.

I'd bisect this and verify things, but I'm really hoping I don't have to.

I still have a number of pull requests for the merge window, so
instead I'm sending this email out with my current guesses, and I hope
someody will say "Yeah, you're right, the fix is already pending", or
"No Linus, you're barking up completely the wrong tree, but I think I
know what the problem is".

Btw, I'm not a networking person, but I have to say, I've seen rtnl
lock problems enough over time even as an outsider to have grown to
really hate that thing. Am I wrong? It really seems to get involved
much too much, and held in really awkward places.

Am I wrong?

             Linus

             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-05 22:41 Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-06-06  7:56 ` Hang on wireless removal Johannes Berg
2020-06-08  7:14   ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-08  7:15     ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wj0QUaYcLHKG=_fw65NqhGbqvnU958SkHak9mg9qNwR+A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).