From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
raven@themaw.net, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/10] pipe: Add fsync() support [ver #2]
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 15:03:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj1BLz6s9cG9Ptk4ULxrTy=MkF7ZH=HF67d7M5HL1fd_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC3328CC-2F05-461E-AAC3-8DEBAB1BA162@amacapital.net>
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:31 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> Add in the fact that it’s not obvious that vmsplice *can* be used correctly, and I’m wondering if we should just remove it or make it just do write() under the hood.
Sure it can. Just don't modify the data you vmsplice. It's really that simple.
That said, if we don't have any actual users, then we should look at
removing it (maybe turning it into "write()" as you say). Not because
it's hard to use, but simply because it probably doesn't have that
many uses.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-02 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 20:17 [RFC PATCH 00/10] pipe: Notification queue preparation [ver #2] David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] pipe: Reduce #inclusion of pipe_fs_i.h " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] Remove the nr_exclusive argument from __wake_up_sync_key() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] Add wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length " David Howells
2019-10-26 14:58 ` [pipe] 6567a02d20: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2019-10-27 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length [ver #2] Linus Torvalds
2019-10-30 16:19 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 20:35 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-30 22:16 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 22:38 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-31 15:11 ` David Howells
2019-10-31 15:57 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-11-01 14:53 ` David Howells
2019-10-31 14:57 ` David Howells
2019-11-03 11:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-06 21:47 ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-06 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07 0:00 ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-07 1:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-08 17:56 ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-08 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07 6:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-06 22:15 ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] pipe: Allow pipes to have kernel-reserved slots " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup " David Howells
2019-10-27 15:57 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-31 15:21 ` David Howells
2019-10-31 16:38 ` David Howells
2019-11-03 11:04 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] pipe: Remove redundant wakeup from pipe_write() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] pipe: Check for ring full inside of the spinlock in " David Howells
2019-10-24 10:32 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length " David Howells
2019-10-24 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] pipe: Notification queue preparation " Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-24 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/10] pipe: Add fsync() support " David Howells
2019-10-24 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-25 8:34 ` David Howells
2019-10-27 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-27 16:04 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-31 15:13 ` David Howells
2019-10-31 15:15 ` David Howells
2019-11-02 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 19:34 ` David Howells
2019-11-02 20:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-11-02 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 22:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-03 12:02 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wj1BLz6s9cG9Ptk4ULxrTy=MkF7ZH=HF67d7M5HL1fd_A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).