From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D5EC4361B for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBF8224D1 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387551AbgLCWfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:35:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59222 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727415AbgLCWfh (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:35:37 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346ABC061A4F for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:34:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id t6so5039383lfl.13 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cPqbqnUEnkWeeVcA9Ivg1ZBfhCxd+q6cSwKDsuSVW9Q=; b=hDZqi3hqZVw3Nx0Hn7CoAuER/OvORTezXtXnvgKV3ER4hLO95kr/ajwbehZnQKcFso GolO5HCPno+0xCM7TGbrnl4nDmpzCLgx7kYqpQy3dLb+Zk+nHPQ27OR6SVI+z8Zpe3Es MtGNPftm3EuKFMR8SQbJkIq457Fj3zS/BG8CI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cPqbqnUEnkWeeVcA9Ivg1ZBfhCxd+q6cSwKDsuSVW9Q=; b=Ck5zVRnEJeDE5cfO27MLXJG0GfFtxGE8LgA+O8T2TrSnjZsMy/M7HIZY02BXTIuHA5 sMxeN8DPgIIjG55pQOuuCNr2PFD9n/CIUV2CL8rert1ZvW6WklTSPGATt8zhsWJwZbrA k6RM4P3coaO9c0C4jQUmygy9gut+mLHI2zjiYxaQGoR4gKiM5uOy/qs6Wnc7FZt6SgeK 6rzOl7ROqqbVc3iOWZckwqMASheA+7D4FIAGWmFA+ftYKcIgVVn4AA0eJo6UxSmeWBLf 94dLWTtQiG4emsBrOgy9L4B/g9GZP0N+QbM18S7tc68GcASRCF9LNJxoDp5Q319Rz2zp GURw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xxNHDcoTQvazPDzD2/kboMQlhGScQlweTbBHRXkYi3U3iGHza wgN4vqzDKnKRnu8vPnBYfTiDxSEwdWvUyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzViJMYyIl+D6JdduNgHgVkZDQBjynL4WZKvO3gBQ/+CJwsJnwUyhdOeIBg8ZXWOSN1GM2Kzg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5625:: with SMTP id b5mr2220744lff.498.1607034895370; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com. [209.85.167.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u21sm998455lfq.90.2020.12.03.14.34.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u19so5072426lfr.7 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a19:7d04:: with SMTP id y4mr2099404lfc.344.1607034892834; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:34:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201203103315.GA3298@nautica> <20201203221456.GA20620@nautica> In-Reply-To: <20201203221456.GA20620@nautica> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:34:36 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p update for 5.10-rc7 (restore splice ops) To: Dominique Martinet Cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:15 PM Dominique Martinet wrote: > > The problems I had with dkim are all lists that add footers so really > not much to do about header filtering Yeah, that's obviously always going to be a problem with DKIM. But I think all the kernel mailing lists are good now - at least partly because I used to complain about it. The one thing that vger still does - or at least did not that long ago - is to change whitespace in headers. But that is perfectly acceptable SMTP behavior, and it's a problem only when somebody is using "c=strict/strict" in their DKIM setup. And honestly, that's a completely invalid DKIM setting, I don't understand how the DKIM people ever thought it was ok (probably some company politics or other because some vendor was too incompetent to implement the proper relaxed hashing). Linus