From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] device-dax for 5.1: PMEM as RAM
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:01:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjvmwD_0=CRQtNs5RBh8oJwrriXDn+XNWOU=wk8OyQ5ew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4he0q_FdqqiXarp0bXjcggs8QZX8Od560E2iFxzCU3Qag@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:54 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm
> tags/devdax-for-5.1
>
> ...to receive new device-dax infrastructure to allow persistent memory
> and other "reserved" / performance differentiated memories, to be
> assigned to the core-mm as "System RAM".
I'm not pulling this until I get official Intel clarification on the
whole "pmem vs rep movs vs machine check" behavior.
Last I saw it was deadly and didn't work, and we have a whole "mc-safe
memory copy" thing for it in the kernel because repeat string
instructions didn't work correctly on nvmem.
No way am I exposing any users to something like that.
We need a way to know when it works and when it doesn't, and only do
it when it's safe.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-10 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-10 19:54 [GIT PULL] device-dax for 5.1: PMEM as RAM Dan Williams
2019-03-10 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-03-10 23:54 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-11 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-11 15:37 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-12 0:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-12 0:30 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-15 17:33 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-15 20:26 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-16 21:25 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjvmwD_0=CRQtNs5RBh8oJwrriXDn+XNWOU=wk8OyQ5ew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).