linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>,
	k@vodka.home.kg
Subject: Re: Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK?
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:47:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oXsRrABzCjCQ_+O+QJmMgWyoyj73igHLaJKNfbf-brDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5823BCA3.2020202@caviumnetworks.com>

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> Easiest thing to do would be to select 16K page size in your .config, I
> think that will give you a similar sized stack.

I didn't realize that was possible...

I'm mostly concerned about the best way to deal with systems that have
a limited stack size on architectures without support for separate irq
stacks. Part of this I assume involves actually detecting with a
processor definition that the current architecture has a deceptively
small stack.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-09 21:27 Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK? Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-09 21:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-09 23:34   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-10  9:03     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-10 11:41       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-10 13:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-10 17:39           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-10 16:36         ` Matt Redfearn
2016-11-10 17:37           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-10  0:17 ` David Daney
2016-11-10  1:47   ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHmME9oXsRrABzCjCQ_+O+QJmMgWyoyj73igHLaJKNfbf-brDQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=k@vodka.home.kg \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).