From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751765AbcKGTlf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:41:35 -0500
Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:43939 "EHLO frisell.zx2c4.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751360AbcKGTld (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:41:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161107192505.GB34388@google.com>
References: <CAHmME9ogYTGFaNDt1CD0FxEHxDzVhNX=AN3_PH3t=0zREGgYPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161103004934.GA30775@gondor.apana.org.au> <CAHmME9oL-pOWWXXFhJz1vSm5ftnSfmYrquGbH0acapgEL=c4Ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161103.130852.1456848512897088071.davem@davemloft.net> <CAHmME9pm4DHuBsE+hoFxnm1B5OWAZ+OyKXzeKDxHtisZpw4ebg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161104173723.GB34176@google.com> <CAHmME9oejs+USiGJX2P0TgvnR6XRzV1HYZPrq=c-CjGzq59=NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161107182646.GA34388@google.com> <CAHmME9rzBST8Lqapzykwf2rUyxLXuyOF0wX+Sy259Qtx9a4YSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161107192505.GB34388@google.com>
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:41:26 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHmME9prw9b6=s25zUCQqWk+M8JEtJALEvZxa-HavWdpuicV0A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9prw9b6=s25zUCQqWk+M8JEtJALEvZxa-HavWdpuicV0A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poly1305: generic C can be faster on chips with slow
 unaligned access
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>,
        WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_van_Dorst?= <opensource@vdorst.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> wrote:
> No it does *not* buffer all incoming blocks, which is why the source pointer can
> fall out of alignment.  Yes, I actually tested this.  In fact this situation is
> even hit, in both possible places, in the self-tests.

Urgh! v3 coming right up...