Re: [RFC PATCH v3 10/15] crypto: poly1305 - use structures for key and accumulator

["Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>]

Hi Eric,

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 1:17 AM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> Do you prefer that this be merged before or after Zinc?  It seems it may still
> be a while before the community is satisfied with Zinc (and Wireguard which is
> in the same patchset), and I don't want this blocked unnecessarily...  So on my
> part I'd prefer to just have this merged as-is.

Personally I'd prefer this be merged after Zinc, since there's work to
be done on adjusting the 20->12 in chacha20. That's not really much of
a reason though. But maybe we can just sidestep the ordering concern
all together:

What I suspect we should do is make the initial Zinc merge _without_
those top two patches that replace the crypto api's implementations
with Zinc, and defer those until after the initial merges. Those
commits are already written -- so there's no chance it won't happen
due to laziness or something -- and I think the general merge will go
a bit more smoothly if we wait until after. (Somebody suggested we do
it this way at Plumbers, and was actually a bit surprised I had
already ported the crypto API stuff to Zinc.) This way, Adiantum and
Zinc aren't potentially co-dependent in their initial merges and we
can work on the details carefully with each other after both have
landed. I figure this might make things a little bit less stressful
for both of us. How would you feel about doing it that?

Jason