From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CADFC47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D6A613BD for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230250AbhFJKUC (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:20:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:35792 "EHLO mail-pl1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229979AbhFJKT7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:19:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id x19so754008pln.2 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:17:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3j652hMSmumnPjiwDEzvETKW8nYLEioOK5CINNUshec=; b=vBYAOfgSwASBg0zI9JRdcm4Pyz8/ddzff5dfbynz/oO8GfgCbzW47MegVETl9bjakN ktlE+WPeWxs9leXWL/R+xXX5fge1J4vg+Xy5AeXQNarAe60IrBaNoMddhw6LcaAY4Cfa tQa4HoP/TJ79NzyNFCcDDc60yv5zEMn/mvU5ugACPthCuVPRzHar0jyQNYwNmob06yXE L97O4PtgaMM4ydG6D1vHKQd8ix2d0+3WFi16jBiY13MEJu79Z9zm8TFRLfFHsg/gupCp Cxg874UeTI0yINFqmB0FDOmD96hbbImxzIXD/xh0FslIk4bhsNBdxtYffN79cuECecw2 6dQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3j652hMSmumnPjiwDEzvETKW8nYLEioOK5CINNUshec=; b=AzoNRmP/2TEE3P+EZu5FPQtcSRjNfdExm7zN4MQq7/YkrcTo/xrtK7yBHvlBXwaXmD 6L9STqc8V9JgcWDvuXQsM1xG3FdkegQmOhRbsAqp7opVy+oIkXp20moWwsKvvTo2XxLv lObcF2VbKHAPC8c4OEuBkQgxL7xt1W1aQGjBJH/Aj44fin3CmSg0cnPjVNw5FQyZnkHs wlqG5oQFkG7isGS7lAJa/e8DLS5ot+LFUg+JXg7loDEDZ2SUir5Lng16vqCv5WGTMIeX W4bs+lwvXthvU6St/CTCfDh4XVW1KitarweJo1ZgvXuTTo6/hDFzFrCtXiUcJ3NGwKB0 wmHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hw7cVfGdp2XZzA2i6uqzVxceCJQyh6nBsLYO/SLP6u+KGEOJ9 APXZ0CgRI8A2y885Ey4BlXvh44ytMGInZ6B0ugI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFnwjQNLsalt0geh3MXPOsUOTOv3Q+03lVckIBHeA/JbJqTjX6mF5dTdvP0O0fLSwKM3q2VVqR7Ok12zsKXOg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:818:: with SMTP id bk24mr2640093pjb.228.1623320209431; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:16:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1623141934-7699-1-git-send-email-faiyazm@codeaurora.org> <78fc8848-bde8-769e-f8e9-6157d232a60f@suse.cz> <47842d8d-2747-3d0f-8695-122dc23d90e6@codeaurora.org> <7d652fca-23f3-fc03-c7b2-310edcafebb3@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <7d652fca-23f3-fc03-c7b2-310edcafebb3@codeaurora.org> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:16:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs To: Faiyaz Mohammed Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH , glittao@gmail.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org, Vlastimil Babka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:57 AM Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: > On 6/8/2021 11:43 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: > > On 6/8/2021 11:05 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 6/8/21 7:11 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: ... > >> I *think* Andrew wouldn't have this issue, so maybe resend only if he says it's > >> needed. > > Sure, I will send if he ask. > Do I need to send patch with new version number?. Always make your intentions clear. Currently they are unclear (two different submissions with the same versions => confusing). > >> On the other hand I did have troubles to apply the last version locally, patch > >> (tool) complained of patch (file) being malformed at the end. Did you add or > >> delete lines from it after generating the patch? I had to use the recountdiff > > Yes, I added one line manually, I think that causes the issue. > > > >> tool to fix this. If you're going to resend, please make sure it's without the > >> same issue. > >> > > Okay -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko