linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>, 刘炜 <liuwei@actions-semi.com>,
	mp-cs@actions-semi.com, 96boards@ucrobotics.com,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Thompson" <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	hzhang@ucrobotics.com, bdong@ucrobotics.com,
	manivannanece23@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: Add gpio driver for Actions OWL S900 SoC
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:39:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcA8G5gcdn+9_vU096xBa+8=8U0pJtUDObO-BrTiAbEwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228181432.26847-9-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> Add gpio driver for Actions Semi OWL family S900 SoC. Set of registers
> controlling the gpio shares the same register range with pinctrl block.
>
> GPIO registers are organized as 6 banks and each bank controls the
> maximum of 32 gpios.
>

FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

P.S. Comma in terminator line is not needed.

> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig    |   8 ++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile   |   1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-owl.c | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 227 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-owl.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 8dbb2280538d..09ceb98e2434 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -364,6 +364,14 @@ config GPIO_OMAP
>         help
>           Say yes here to enable GPIO support for TI OMAP SoCs.
>
> +config GPIO_OWL
> +       tristate "Actions OWL GPIO support"
> +       default ARCH_ACTIONS
> +       depends on ARCH_ACTIONS || COMPILE_TEST
> +       depends on OF_GPIO
> +       help
> +         Say yes here to enable GPIO support for Actions OWL SoCs.
> +
>  config GPIO_PL061
>         bool "PrimeCell PL061 GPIO support"
>         depends on ARM_AMBA
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index cccb0d40846c..b2bb11d4675f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MXC)                += gpio-mxc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MXS)         += gpio-mxs.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_OCTEON)      += gpio-octeon.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_OMAP)                += gpio-omap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_OWL)         += gpio-owl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X)     += gpio-pca953x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCF857X)     += gpio-pcf857x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCH)         += gpio-pch.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-owl.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-owl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..98f2e98197bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-owl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * OWL SoC's GPIO driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define GPIO_OUTEN     0x0000
> +#define GPIO_INEN      0x0004
> +#define GPIO_DAT       0x0008
> +
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_A 0
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_B 1
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_C 2
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_D 3
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_E 4
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT_F 5
> +
> +struct owl_gpio_port {
> +       const char *name;
> +       unsigned int offset;
> +       unsigned int pins;
> +};
> +
> +struct owl_gpio {
> +       struct gpio_chip gpio;
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port;
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +       int id;
> +};
> +
> +static void owl_gpio_set_reg(void __iomem *base, unsigned int pin, int flag)
> +{
> +       u32 val;
> +
> +       val = readl_relaxed(base);
> +
> +       if (flag)
> +               val |= BIT(pin);
> +       else
> +               val &= ~BIT(pin);
> +
> +       writel_relaxed(val, base);
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * GPIOs have higher priority over other modules, so either setting
> +        * them as OUT or IN is sufficient
> +        */
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_OUTEN, offset, true);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +
> +       /* disable gpio output */
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_OUTEN, offset, false);
> +
> +       /* disable gpio input */
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_INEN, offset, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +       u32 val;
> +
> +       val = readl_relaxed(gpio_base + GPIO_DAT);
> +
> +       return !!(val & BIT(offset));
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +       u32 val;
> +
> +       val = readl_relaxed(gpio_base + GPIO_DAT);
> +
> +       if (value)
> +               val |= BIT(offset);
> +       else
> +               val &= ~BIT(offset);
> +
> +       writel_relaxed(val, gpio_base + GPIO_DAT);
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_OUTEN, offset, false);
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_INEN, offset, true);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int owl_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                               unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port = gpio->port;
> +       void __iomem *gpio_base = gpio->base + port->offset;
> +
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_INEN, offset, false);
> +       owl_gpio_set_reg(gpio_base + GPIO_OUTEN, offset, true);
> +       owl_gpio_set(chip, offset, value);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define OWL_GPIO_PORT(port, base, count)               \
> +       [OWL_GPIO_PORT_##port] = {                      \
> +               .name = #port,                          \
> +               .offset = base,                         \
> +               .pins = count,                          \
> +       }
> +
> +static const struct owl_gpio_port s900_gpio_ports[] = {
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(A, 0x0000, 32),
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(B, 0x000C, 32),
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(C, 0x0018, 12),
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(D, 0x0024, 30),
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(E, 0x0030, 32),
> +       OWL_GPIO_PORT(F, 0x00F0, 8),
> +};
> +
> +static int owl_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct owl_gpio *gpio;
> +       const struct owl_gpio_port *port;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gpio)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       gpio->base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> +       if (IS_ERR(gpio->base))
> +               return PTR_ERR(gpio->base);
> +
> +       gpio->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "gpio");
> +       if (gpio->id < 0)
> +               return gpio->id;
> +
> +       port = &s900_gpio_ports[gpio->id];
> +
> +       gpio->gpio.request = owl_gpio_request;
> +       gpio->gpio.free = owl_gpio_free;
> +       gpio->gpio.get = owl_gpio_get;
> +       gpio->gpio.set = owl_gpio_set;
> +       gpio->gpio.direction_input = owl_gpio_direction_input;
> +       gpio->gpio.direction_output = owl_gpio_direction_output;
> +
> +       gpio->gpio.base = -1;
> +       gpio->gpio.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +       gpio->gpio.label = port->name;
> +       gpio->gpio.ngpio = port->pins;
> +
> +       gpio->port = port;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
> +
> +       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gpio, gpio);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register gpiochip\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id owl_gpio_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "actions,s900-gpio", },
> +       { /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, owl_gpio_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver owl_gpio_driver = {
> +       .driver         = {
> +               .name   = "owl-gpio",
> +               .of_match_table = owl_gpio_of_match,
> +       },
> +       .probe          = owl_gpio_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(owl_gpio_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Actions Semi OWL SoCs GPIO driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.14.1
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 18:14 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl and gpio support Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add bindings for Actions S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-01  9:20   ` Linus Walleij
2018-03-01  9:25     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-01 10:23       ` Daniel Thompson
2018-03-01 10:33         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: dts: actions: Add pinctrl node for S900 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64: actions: Enable PINCTRL in platforms Kconfig Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-03-01 17:29     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] dt-bindings: gpio: Add gpio nodes for Actions S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: dts: actions: Add S900 gpio nodes Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: dts: actions: Add gpio line names to Bubblegum-96 board Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: Add gpio driver for Actions OWL S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:39   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] MAINTAINERS: Add reviewer for ACTIONS platforms Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-02-28 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl and gpio entries Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHp75VcA8G5gcdn+9_vU096xBa+8=8U0pJtUDObO-BrTiAbEwQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=96boards@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=bdong@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hzhang@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuwei@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=manivannanece23@gmail.com \
    --cc=mp-cs@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).