From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC63C3F2CD for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D3520714 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jvK6zIz+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727422AbgCTOrU (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:47:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:45145 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726913AbgCTOrS (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:47:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id j10so3317028pfi.12; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 07:47:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lzqksOZo9oKzssQWd4+TCqMTVJHNfIm+9Q0SEfaLBjU=; b=jvK6zIz+Qr1G8bcWBVBwn3UfzcaK9sRBJks8raIHNoHYfHO2DmiGRVxPhd4Zu5DrCz ssEKRSg6XEUN2Bh1T3t8FxP+2Llw4OryQC/PYqdtuX2VGcpgpXUJOggqoxLEX14U+Ycg LuBarYM6L87ZRlUuDNsMpGMqd9Lb0heHLMtAbs43E7wHfpmR6nmXZQONvOHiQl54CxGC FbYDgx36/VNKIJit0ypjsiN2/VZSsJQdz4/Mwai+3I0nY+qHqo5TS73yp5yHMdK5Qlep kuFS3nbtw7pZAsbQO+unr7n7vI9tW6NkdNc+MtzoBeK6iS8kQ/6WAkOhGDlo0f0qjuhv Qn5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lzqksOZo9oKzssQWd4+TCqMTVJHNfIm+9Q0SEfaLBjU=; b=U5ck6+lKlgn5sTOS5RWvgpsCNcJXPaHjnWkqQU1h1GU6ZY7YR/YtKJaq/xELTmo7+H aTrxPs/1yuSrMx+tDzdd4BpBR3gkjY9/iEpf+qcWKTrS554suBY+H2NCKz8utLTGa7H+ 0uqqxV3yLvKEmIw9765/E/KTYlRY+ko/tnoeCg7HOwJQzNrewJg5aCWxc3N9gJznTAEP SGbJqu7clSt3/osBYr+skzxiuqLqRQI3YnZuUoVgdAMBnAd3ekffZCg7nzCppopSmjra PqxlKei2M/AWTkFJ/nOkeQd1rNlT2IgzAtuVcZDfwfAxnIQhBh0RI34faWQI6zJWFx4Q zPuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0sgjdP5uJfn7kQg/7n9J4P5lEe9bxQQhopwtfSRDfIIepf2szt eBXcz4PkzABVgVx7ZZxseX2hdKXW6jvw0upGOaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtsQgQOnLRlTrTgGM50EY41vnr51HFNUk9V7349gPUFHWyFKZzvnxnlkchBu6NONcJcSUPuUU7T2einYPojAXw= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9348:: with SMTP id 8mr10286496pfn.36.1584715637228; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 07:47:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.467730627@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20200320131509.467730627@linutronix.de> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:47:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Chanwoo Choi , Jacob Pan , Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers > instead of the grufty C89 ones. > > Rename the local macro wrapper to X86_MATCH for consistency. It stays for > readability sake. > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NULL), > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NULL), > -#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, } > +#define X86_MATCH(model) X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(model, NULL) Maybe we can do a generic macro to avoid all these ', NULL' repetitions? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko