From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047E8C433B4 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A1961029 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239702AbhDLKyy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:54:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239667AbhDLKys (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:54:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E21F4C061574; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id p16so2196849plf.12; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vilFxhUb0+fJEQ/bexM0f2QpCiANSDnsZGZs3eqyMYM=; b=lF28eNL9V4iMj5dHWeAx+9PsmNCjvV3aqUw/RLQRsMbLw/Pg+k59KNP8GaGcjeyVbG FqvyG1UfZxfjzIY+oxw5QvylWHRtJXiWaeynTK5dxkCkwnyF02EVnrRDNISr/MZ27HTf 6N+eJNVfHuPn8kBsvqf+bGnEz38HG/fLfYJ6xUMGo4zponPdd5HWIymlTYNKFPJl1fMb JbWUHguCoIlMTVs7b+woOaZ4fOnjG7qFVwsD5VQZB3lIQ3yUp66xrQNQw/vqADAZVl1V UJ68269RLz4HrqFyEgvePr3VFHL7pwqS1At7kkFDdUyZ37IITGefXFPq7B6LXwdwrjyS hdUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vilFxhUb0+fJEQ/bexM0f2QpCiANSDnsZGZs3eqyMYM=; b=ESBdY7FENMGXih8FdJdPrMear7eLRs/A1id4becz3RfVZmL4r3vK9/E6ELkGTLnNH+ qWBKhyfUcqqdJXZ7RnsCwCHkvqz7mAxEcYheLJ+OtF2CydSBNzhdrcTNetTnHy8ZFleC XsF6qr7pbDoiIB661b1l1prhTIwbcb1/+RGlHRLGQOos9PRR5eidS2j/oPTpamgysmk1 LjAbkp12L4aVJv/qB8OlAGJz3mphzFJAASx9SQC/WAVdzRO4hCkvkExqbiYfzcybIxvp F7QKReiGzzJvbJRXpgqM5eIuGmJUb2c3rYCd7jAII+SaasWq+A3up+bx55oNfVcuDmPR UXoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GtocYFO2AGeZiAXaZnFsVTbSZ9yutfGxQuWWFRtq9DOazap5H +cz4nrUKGaQpf91YhKedCvVLh53gE3nwv05Uw4b0p8gZdWA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8FZxzadh13/jUIN4JpLedliPzTgtCHeJOWgD4q/KKVnmabFXOEmU3gTX+PMo0vgzalj0xlHEmo9gL7J0g4rs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0a:: with SMTP id pg10mr28773614pjb.129.1618224870426; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210412090430.167463-1-linux-kernel-dev@beckhoff.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:54:13 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Match all Beckhoff Automation baytrail boards with critclk_systems DMI table To: linux-kernel-dev Cc: "hdegoede@redhat.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , "mgross@linux.intel.com" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:39 PM linux-kernel-dev wrote: > On Mo, 2021-04-12 at 12:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:29 PM Steffen Dirkwinkel > > wrote: ... > > I'm afraid it's a bit too much. Is there any guarantee all the boards > > based on x86 will be Baytrail only? > > > Sorry, I guess I should make this clearer in the message. > All boards with "CBxx63" are Baytrail. Exactly! And this supports my idea that this shouldn't be done like in this patch. Are you guaranteeing that *all x86-based* boards produced by your company will be Baytrail only? Above tells that the answer is rather "no". So, I think we can't apply this patch in its current form. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko