From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFD2C2D0A3 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22B222409 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WM+YtojM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728977AbgKCMFh (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 07:05:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728784AbgKCMFf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 07:05:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77AA1C0613D1; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:05:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id a200so13990772pfa.10; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:05:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CoUtQrJSQRYVKiicQfT9b8FMAZeeb+zxod1LbaNVVzE=; b=WM+YtojMtExY2bSx1rZgI2jNzAxVBzt+gQy5d6FlFB2ZQ2+tYra7w3xUImdiB+4aCf 74xlNxvl1zafd+USLWhF854/j/ZmXaeNwS2v68wzLERsUozQD9eavP6APlj9hD/95GCf e5WhrwGzr9L0hAv7c8dBT4ZJAZ1AZkXA0byYWy7vGhF6pkyEQBvC0gk7Zya6rn5Gitmx 0QouET8V/OMgrTYTGYgfO4eYvYyRBauKwGxZuULll1gOABkJJO547wTYFsrCF8wTZsl+ 7T0XRiHLRwTWQbA9BYv4YkX+abx1uCKY4dleuVBYPVruBvQi1tKqVeKpHfCUPUfRPq0L VEwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CoUtQrJSQRYVKiicQfT9b8FMAZeeb+zxod1LbaNVVzE=; b=Hi67p+bKa0um10GaSYgG5EcnVgkZ+4e6tctuxMVNfGR59+whH+K+P5cP2f+zpbffgj lU6aRz4HCFBiSU/0ib8ks3hEbsXV7xgL8pTMQ87ljNbwRe7BDDcidNtYJGWJGTJnKICX q9p+sJpIayVjcNltNicpfxg81jrZfTvWtNiQqwdo4FJuyerjeKyj30dutjYbSw26t9vF 3M93rYr/IXtA6MxBjcDFTNtdv5HhBjVYU2jXQ67Ew69vw7zd8RY26ZX+3Bc1dh9CwMKy FLr1gbcyZkrCNF0OciK6XDQxg7tFTdIYzF6Ek9hlnslG6tJGRAHBFkU42Rw2JeY3+VMe QSxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AOW4WsMtEMXAnw/JJ3uY+kxa+teOAOBqy3/r1YWbh+Ub5y5sn o30yoWYHTY53uNMHmPNkrkemim+utMq2Mp4n/+k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUO60AuqbTEpZJUSjqUhnIPjXMPgP8GNKeKA0lClIJQEIZVlsw/a1hRyj6/h1KU1n4Q3C6NkqxI7vqhDJ0z/0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:850:b029:18a:a8ce:d346 with SMTP id q16-20020a056a000850b029018aa8ced346mr16078623pfk.73.1604405134945; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:05:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201103111049.51916-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> <20201103113353.GC4077@smile.fi.intel.com> <20201103115223.GA268796@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20201103115223.GA268796@kroah.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:06:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: Convert test_printf.c to KUnit To: Greg KH Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>, Brendan Higgins , Shuah Khan , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexandre Belloni , Randy Dunlap , Ilya Dryomov , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:54 PM Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:40:49PM +0530, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote: ... > > Better, indeed. > > > > But can be this improved to have a cumulative statistics, like showing only > > number of total, succeeded, failed with details of the latter ones? > > Is that the proper test output format? We have a standard... I dunno. I'm asking... We have few possibilities here: a) let it go like above, b) use the cumulative statistics, c) if there is no such available, implement and use it, d) ... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko