From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034500AbeBPOui (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:50:38 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:41716 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033381AbeBPOug (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:50:36 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224AC8PxnxIvJw6xXGFnWS0kttj+yl3SMgBlCvlgtUfWeG8YFZemid3qK466BfOPUHBFsJXF4YpVSNFnGx+IFE0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <010001602cf53153-39ad69f1-1b39-4e6d-a748-9455a16c2fbd-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20171210182152.70ad8fbf@archlinux> <01000160dccefcb4-25edfd89-56f3-486f-88a4-cb8c07253974-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20180114104330.2aa7c1fd@archlinux> <20180128094021.572ab366@archlinux> <20180130160107.000006df@huawei.com> <197f448e-322f-dae4-aa4b-3cc2bd5b16bb@pressers.name> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:50:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200 To: Steve Presser Cc: Hans de Goede , Hartmut Knaack , Jeremy Cline , Jonathan Cameron , Jonathan Cameron , Lars Kellogg-Stedman , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mika Westerberg , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Wolfram Sang , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Steve Presser wrote: > Hi Andy, > > No good news. It looks like the vanilla 4.15 series doesn't boot on this > system. Still working on tracking down why/when it broke/if this is due to a > Debian patch. Just in case: you may cherry-pick necessary patches (4 or 5 from the tip of mentioned branch) to whatever kernel you are using. Though I'm not sure how far v4.15 from v4.12 in a sense of the code it touches. > Would it still be an effective test if I backported the changes to 4.12 (or > 4.12-debian)? I know that series boots. OK, continue waiting for your testing. >> >> Here [1] is the branch with another approach. Can you test it and tell >> >> if it fixes the issue? >> >> >> >> [1]: https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic/iio-acpi >> >> It's based on linux-next + compiletest branch of IIO subsystem. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko