From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
charles.chenxin@huawei.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:04:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd7eNH546ZUhzkt30Xi_jFpHMn+seLQXLhuvbwC+g7bsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461136429-85114-3-git-send-email-qiujiang@huawei.com>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote:
> This patch converts device node to fwnode for dwapb driver, so
> as to provide a unified fwnode for DT and ACPI bindings.
>
> Tested-by: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index 772d743..92bc204 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -290,14 +291,14 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
> struct dwapb_port_property *pp)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *gc = &port->gc;
> - struct device_node *node = pp->node;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = pp->fwnode;
> struct irq_chip_generic *irq_gc = NULL;
> unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
> struct irq_chip_type *ct;
> int err, i;
>
> - gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, ngpio,
> - &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
> + gpio->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, ngpio,
> + &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
> if (!gpio->domain)
> return;
>
> @@ -415,7 +416,8 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> - port->gc.of_node = pp->node;
> + port->gc.of_node = is_of_node(pp->fwnode) ?
> + to_of_node(pp->fwnode) : NULL;
Someone commented on this that it's simple
…of_node = to_of_node(…);
> #endif
> port->gc.ngpio = pp->ngpio;
> port->gc.base = pp->gpio_base;
> @@ -447,19 +449,15 @@ static void dwapb_gpio_unregister(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
> }
>
> static struct dwapb_platform_data *
> -dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
> +dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct device_node *node, *port_np;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata;
> struct dwapb_port_property *pp;
> int nports;
> int i;
>
> - node = dev->of_node;
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> -
> - nports = of_get_child_count(node);
> + nports = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
> if (nports == 0)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> @@ -474,18 +472,18 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
> pdata->nports = nports;
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) {
> pp = &pdata->properties[i++];
> - pp->node = port_np;
> + pp->fwnode = fwnode;
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
> + if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
> pp->idx >= DWAPB_MAX_PORTS) {
> dev_err(dev,
> "missing/invalid port index for port%d\n", i);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "snps,nr-gpios",
> + if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "snps,nr-gpios",
> &pp->ngpio)) {
> dev_info(dev,
> "failed to get number of gpios for port%d\n",
> @@ -497,9 +495,10 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
> * Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of
> * the IP.
> */
> - if (pp->idx == 0 &&
> - of_property_read_bool(port_np, "interrupt-controller")) {
> - pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(port_np, 0);
> + if (dev->of_node && pp->idx == 0 &&
> + fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode,
> + "interrupt-controller")) {
> + pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(to_of_node(fwnode), 0);
> if (!pp->irq)
> dev_warn(dev, "no irq for port%d\n", pp->idx);
> }
> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>
> if (!pdata) {
> - pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(dev);
> + pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(pdata))
> return PTR_ERR(pdata);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> index a4ef99b..a24b35f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Set the properties for portA */
> - pdata->properties->node = NULL;
> + pdata->properties->fwnode = NULL;
> pdata->properties->idx = 0;
> pdata->properties->ngpio = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
> pdata->properties->gpio_base = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> index 955b579..2dc7f4a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #define GPIO_DW_APB_H
>
> struct dwapb_port_property {
> - struct device_node *node;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> unsigned int idx;
> unsigned int ngpio;
> unsigned int gpio_base;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 7:13 [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 7:13 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] gpio: dwapb: remove name from dwapb_port_property Jiang Qiu
2016-04-29 9:21 ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-20 7:13 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-04-21 11:33 ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 7:13 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:06 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-20 16:10 ` Alan Tull
2016-04-21 11:43 ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-21 11:42 ` Jiang Qiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHp75Vd7eNH546ZUhzkt30Xi_jFpHMn+seLQXLhuvbwC+g7bsA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \
--cc=delicious.quinoa@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=qiujiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).