From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549DDC282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BB220818 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="d3ddIB3R" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729323AbfBLKmK (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:42:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:43553 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728909AbfBLKjC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:39:02 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id q17so1093005pfh.10; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:39:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fqY4P2eYdKgxqtOm2MYGL2GqiOza+mZcZqBwzxHlMfY=; b=d3ddIB3R03kACqgoLZik6hryMgyRyyu2dWAZEvKtvvvXetLP8uQRgjN54SzxSfEvnN yIbA21gNGZ/LsBmP+RxMMCrMHZXOc4rdyHyfLaZ7tOwmhBOhp9N9Ty1iCL1utoNX0Rtg UsHwZjEsxI6n8AvodKgYoAmj+ann439xkVw534JKCwI2hlIpERx7bA1zAlt0Ho/zQC9z t7ZgKIj0HEIi4WxYb66xkKgbBxXHmrNKLBFSvjbasB9ZNIY43ovIHF9vti14xrnJ8ana CKuzf8k4TAJ1F5b0hfeCb7YICB9ru1r3LFUobKY7kVflJDUAh//1Lzr8wcHL3bcrrP3X N4hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fqY4P2eYdKgxqtOm2MYGL2GqiOza+mZcZqBwzxHlMfY=; b=YYqxeD5pQzgWsoXb8oVMw02V4ojY45nYwlEJfnQa485mEvcgZ/QWN2XDe11EwENq5A MH6oL1uohJGmSmDmv9+8AH15GGJmPgoxvGcWJoV9Ik4le82qIRAMxLCWrMeGXp61Q14P Szz9vqIsOkp4CVp9pDSB5FGrEBK428Z7V5Obh2Oe+PJPQughnY58Gynn+mCRru70alLW 2CurP8YDSC1bSXTI7/pYBhUcCQ5ZYZM7NBliDYrIg75mHAz8Bp9Uhg37G0y6M85Pm3mH fwh1I5QcxdrNOnxMlhXaoC6wMkPh8o+l2JNqmvcmhgqto/DKRZdzkWgUWHQD/PzJSUGb EsYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZ5bdBTrCg58ARssGBiJtQvLU9S8gcb4wFsgqvCTBT+nfLZWhrm jn3SD9hJ+rFZyDSJpwvLY22ZuEDAOtsMyIVrzfHk4rtu X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbNLFRGmmQ8VeGy5Sy53Nrn4fdpmMvO4rayMf3X03hniOtEGDmt+pjvxaEJywvbmVnjGvr/egKOThsC5EW0KhE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:20e:: with SMTP id 14mr2994592pgc.161.1549967941912; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:39:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190201073234.13280-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190201073234.13280-10-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190211164118.GA23796@genxfsim-desktop> <78e5e6b3-5712-6ef5-283c-83b0f6d3dcc7@linux.intel.com> <38444053-cbab-ae6d-9504-18ca3cd84d15@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <38444053-cbab-ae6d-9504-18ca3cd84d15@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:38:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Package cstates residency info To: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" Cc: Anshuman Gupta , Platform Driver , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arjan van de Ven , "David E. Box" , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote: > On 12-Feb-19 3:55 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:32 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh > > wrote: > >> On 11-Feb-19 10:11 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote: > Sure Andy, I can do as you suggest but i am confused now because on > another patch i've got "Acked-and-tested-by" only i.e. just one single > tag. So for consistency, what should i do? I also noticed that this tag > is used about 59 times in Linux kernel and i even found one > "Reported-Acked-and-Tested-by" too :) though i understand these may not > be acceptable by all Maintainers. So, please guide. The rule of thumb is to be closer to what you got from a person and at the same time don't push custom (non- or rarely used) tags. So, 59 uses seems okay to me to use that tag as is. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko