From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752803AbeEVUej (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 16:34:39 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:39128 "EHLO mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752636AbeEVUeh (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 16:34:37 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoOYaJQPKS2cejlaElJLc9NaKNkPKWEZFiEdEWusbeQPihEEcxkQuY4SruAwQgO1VwsdQoduIVVxao94rB3yLI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180522142417.19639-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20180522142417.19639-2-dmurphy@ti.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:34:36 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] leds: lm3601x: Introduce the lm3601x LED driver To: Dan Murphy Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jacek Anaszewski , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux LED Subsystem Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > On 05/22/2018 03:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> +static struct lm3601x_led *fled_cdev_to_led( >>> + struct led_classdev_flash *fled_cdev) >> >> Didn't notice before. This will look much better in one line. > > Gives LTL warning. I wouldn't really care about it. But I leave to Jacek to decide. After addressing the rest, FWIW, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko