From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
robhkernel.org@smile.fi.intel.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
qi-ming.wu@intel.com, yixin.zhu@linux.intel.com,
cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, rahul.tanwar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: intel: Add CGU clock driver for a new SoC
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 16:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdtsXjW5kaWVspi-5u6ya5512Yk7VN4HJ4Tn34PWci5Og@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db9b8978-b9ae-d1bf-2477-78a99b82367a@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 7:06 AM Tanwar, Rahul
<rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 2/9/2019 8:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 03:20:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 03:43:13PM +0800, Tanwar, Rahul wrote:
> >>> On 28/8/2019 11:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:00:17PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> >>>>> + { .val = 0, .div = 1 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 1, .div = 2 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 2, .div = 3 },
> >> 1
> >>
> >>>>> + { .val = 3, .div = 4 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 4, .div = 5 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 5, .div = 6 },
> >> 1
> >>
> >>>>> + { .val = 6, .div = 8 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 7, .div = 10 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 8, .div = 12 },
> >> 2
> >>
> >>>>> + { .val = 9, .div = 16 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 10, .div = 20 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 11, .div = 24 },
> >> 4
> >>
> >>>>> + { .val = 12, .div = 32 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 13, .div = 40 },
> >>>>> + { .val = 14, .div = 48 },
> >> 8
> >>
> >>>>> + { .val = 15, .div = 64 },
> >> 16
> >>
> >>
> >> So, now we see the pattern:
> >>
> >> div = val < 3 ? (val + 1) : (1 << ((val - 3) / 3));
> > It's not complete, but I think you got the idea.
> >
> >> So, can we eliminate table?
>
> In the desperation to eliminate table, below is what i can come up with:
>
> struct clk_div_table div_table[16];
But this is not an elimination, it's just a replacement from static to
dynamically calculated one.
> int i, j;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> div_table[i].val = i;
>
> for (i = 0, j=0; i < 16; i+=3, j++) {
> div_table[i].div = (i == 0) ? (1 << j) : (1 << (j + 1));
> if (i == 15)
> break;
>
> div_table[i + 1].div = (i == 0) ? ((1 << j) + 1) :
> (1 << (j + 1)) + (1 << (j - 1));
> div_table[i + 2].div = (3 << j);
> }
>
> To me, table still looks a better approach. Also, table is more extendable &
> consistent w.r.t. clk framework & other referenced clk drivers.
>
> Whats your opinion ?
Whatever CCF maintainers is fine with.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-07 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-28 7:00 [PATCH v1 0/2] clk: intel: Add a new driver for a new clock controller IP Rahul Tanwar
2019-08-28 7:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: intel: Add CGU clock driver for a new SoC Rahul Tanwar
2019-08-28 15:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-02 7:43 ` Tanwar, Rahul
2019-09-02 12:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-02 12:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-12-06 4:39 ` Tanwar, Rahul
2019-12-07 14:57 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2019-12-24 3:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-02 22:20 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-09-03 9:54 ` Tanwar, Rahul
2019-09-03 18:53 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-09-04 8:03 ` Tanwar, Rahul
2019-09-05 20:47 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-09-09 14:16 ` Kim, Cheol Yong
2019-09-16 18:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-03 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-28 7:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] dt-bindings: clk: intel: Add bindings document & header file for CGU Rahul Tanwar
2019-12-19 16:33 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHp75VdtsXjW5kaWVspi-5u6ya5512Yk7VN4HJ4Tn34PWci5Og@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=cheol.yong.kim@intel.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=qi-ming.wu@intel.com \
--cc=rahul.tanwar@intel.com \
--cc=rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robhkernel.org@smile.fi.intel.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=yixin.zhu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).