From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750815AbdE0RoB (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2017 13:44:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:33907 "EHLO mail-qk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744AbdE0Rn7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2017 13:43:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170524120405.19079-3-vkuznets@redhat.com> References: <20170524120405.19079-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20170524120405.19079-3-vkuznets@redhat.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt , Jork Loeser , Simon Xiao , Andy Lutomirski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting > more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we > currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > Tested-by: Simon Xiao > Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam > + u32 max_vp_index; > + u32 max_lp_index; > + pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n", > + ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index); And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?! %u, please. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko