From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751466AbdAPWeA (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:34:00 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:36168 "EHLO mail-qt0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdAPWd6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:33:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170116215851.GA18142@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <20170116215851.GA18142@ulmo.ba.sec> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:33:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable? To: Thierry Reding Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he >> responsive? > > Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December > and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like. Good you are here! >> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two >> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or >> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago. >> >> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on. >> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them. > > I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just > need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push. Thanks! It's indeed important to us. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko