From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1344BC433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A1B2076C for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RZZDUD00" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729123AbgFHIIp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:08:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725840AbgFHIIn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:08:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com (mail-pg1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6550C08C5C3; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id r18so2126134pgk.11; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EjQrNI7zMF5Y0xzLknVc46R0yFUGyl7fiVcSOqERa14=; b=RZZDUD00YwOtVNwzgGPCI+e7H3TDtuuQGuEK8G7YYt41keF2lpqb1wi+//816DbHjM Rdp7YBRxsCNrkgl9OHYTWy2xzCXAK/s71sZI1nFAXkPUb5Y/kUT8D2IAVbucBlwE9CHk 4wuGm4YHzCKqzKAKBhEBptOwXOTYbLsVirrJQyUmOYBB4vhrcsxIJjJ2nBeEIgiQ+YQt uxLk0+8SMAW2UpQ859oLONzv2VsYK1t6GgZl1L9i5rEPtfBi6DehEFhUgZ1vcFg0CMly Ii6MZ0P1yNMq+S33WLeAv1UOZC4Vnf2QQUV2a6Qcqer+RLXToqXiS7ZBrVGvBK9gFL7r Ujag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EjQrNI7zMF5Y0xzLknVc46R0yFUGyl7fiVcSOqERa14=; b=Tvnv0qHgoPCMdhDBSw+rRlCZC1Y2j/BTyTWJuMRDdeLXfcuobRJ0a7xN3ux5UpJbyE yt+9fJshGK7bsxakq8PobRULyKoLtwpsBnycrhru9VM7SOWnJNqRJLH1ZwxGF+8AIgPg bxqOKsCoLc7m5xz1iObYSs0qXOdzkMDmB4JH3NVQffriJu9MmPqeU5nPatXbXyH3oFhD OyKxSZNuKu0jJ+UAYgH/4CGv4ohYmG/S5FO4aq7O0JVJqzWLkyeGuFi47OqKyWPjMz23 Mr8n1vxb3vh/6FRNmvnUDI5Xt830E8Hsr4w9jAqHavJV5wDZDF08yfCZvFYp/12e3Lep Y7Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308jx16h3mNA0IVuqwXgN1QJHVpejHDnMYQ05XVLaaS/YVuOmz9 AACyvjaahIk4uj4FhV2FzWVERGj2oTuZ3C47AV913711+Ms= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKRWTwRX0pDGMW4ExqWawPbvKubDRxnRbyrCcddZ7gu9m6CQYK9vaCREIITOf/cY90yJ7yKPGRrWsSLwITUAc= X-Received: by 2002:a63:545a:: with SMTP id e26mr18979915pgm.4.1591603722451; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 01:08:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200604233003.GA102768@rikard> <20200607203411.70913-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> <20200607203411.70913-2-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:08:30 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] bits: Add tests of GENMASK To: Rikard Falkeborn Cc: Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Emil Velikov , Kees Cook , Linus Walleij , Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kbuild test robot , Syed Nayyar Waris , William Breathitt Gray , Masahiro Yamada Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:08 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:34 PM Rikard Falkeborn > wrote: > > > > Add tests of GENMASK and GENMASK_ULL. > > > > A few test cases that should fail compilation are provided under ifdef. > > > > Thank you very much! > > > * New patch. First time I wrote a KUnittest so may be room for > > improvements... > > Have you considered to unify them with existing test_bitops.h? test_bitops.c, of course. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko