From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751693AbdEHQIg (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 12:08:36 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]:34555 "EHLO mail-qk0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbdEHQIe (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 12:08:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170508160120.GB25206@w540> References: <1493281194-5200-1-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <1493281194-5200-2-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <20170508160120.GB25206@w540> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 19:08:32 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] pinctrl: generic: Add bi-directional and output-enable To: jmondi Cc: Linus Walleij , Chris Brandt , Jacopo Mondi , Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Pinchart , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King - ARM Linux , Linux-Renesas , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:01 PM, jmondi wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> wrote: >> >> > Linus, for me it looks like better to revert that change, until we >> > will have clear picture why existing configuration parameters can't >> > work. >> >> Yeah I'll revert the binding for fixes. > As it seems we won't be able to proceed with the currently proposed solution, > would that be acceptable now that we use the "pinmux" property to add > flags as BIDIR Can you explain what does this *electrically* mean? Second question, what makes it differ to what already exists? > and SWIO_[INPUT|OUTPUT] directly there? Ditto. > This was my original proposal, rejected because we were using the "pins" > property at the time. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko