From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andreas Bombe" <aeb@debian.org>, "Karel Zak" <kzak@redhat.com>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrius Štikonas" <andrius@stikonas.eu>,
"Curtis Gedak" <gedakc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & FAT32 label
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 15:56:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfwLh9eH992nB1TiOVYOpEV6OSTGkbLau=eQRPeczeFyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171105133929.7cscboxymmpkw634@pali>
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2017 10:35:48 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> >> On Thursday 12 October 2017 12:13:11 Karel Zak wrote:
>> > I was worried that there might be some scripts or programs that expect
>>
>> If we really care about such scripts another approach might be to
>> introduce a CLI switch to "spec compatible mode" to each tool and
>> suggest in documentation to use it.
>>
>> There are also variants:
>> - spec compatible
>> - WinXX compatible
>> - DOS compatible
>> - etc
>
> I did tests with MS-DOS and Windows versions (results in previous
> email), and they seems to be compatible how they read label.
>
> Based on results I would suggest to ignore label from the boot sector
> when reading label.
So, for tools which are not doing that to add
--ignore-boot-sector-label (or alike) [recommended]
right?
We don't actually know how many users (scripts) are relying on current
behaviour.
If there are only few, we may introduce backward compatibility switch
--read-boot-sector-label
> This makes behavior consistent with older MS-DOS
> systems and also all Windows systems. This change would be a problem
> only for users who have label stored only in boot sector. After change
> they would not see label anymore -- exactly same what MS-DOS or Windows
> show them. Seems that mkdosfs stores label to both location, since
> support for label was introduced. So different label would be visible
> only for users who used dosfslabel prior to version 3.0.16.
>
> What do you think?
So, in summary it looks like a documentation needs update (to mark
your research).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-05 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 15:33 Linux & FAT32 label Pali Rohár
2017-10-11 21:24 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-11 21:29 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-11 21:44 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-12 8:56 ` Karel Zak
2017-10-12 9:21 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-12 10:13 ` Karel Zak
2017-10-12 20:49 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-16 1:12 ` Andreas Bombe
2017-10-16 7:28 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-30 15:29 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-31 8:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-05 13:39 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-05 13:56 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-11-05 14:07 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-05 14:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-05 14:34 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-05 14:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-11-05 14:56 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-06 10:14 ` Karel Zak
2017-11-09 8:59 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-09 11:02 ` Karel Zak
2017-11-05 20:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-05 21:12 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-07 17:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-09 9:01 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-09 16:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-09 17:33 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-05 14:12 ` Andrius Štikonas
2017-10-15 6:59 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-15 22:04 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-16 1:12 ` Andreas Bombe
2017-11-05 13:06 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-09 21:21 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-19 12:44 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-20 11:12 ` Karel Zak
2017-11-22 8:52 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-22 11:03 ` Karel Zak
2017-11-22 14:29 ` Andrius Štikonas
2017-11-23 9:01 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-26 19:19 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-27 12:13 ` Karel Zak
2018-02-14 21:52 ` Pali Rohár
2018-02-14 21:54 ` Pali Rohár
2018-02-15 10:21 ` Karel Zak
2018-03-07 8:28 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-29 23:21 ` Pali Rohár
2018-01-29 16:49 ` Pali Rohár
2017-12-16 22:45 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHp75VfwLh9eH992nB1TiOVYOpEV6OSTGkbLau=eQRPeczeFyA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=aeb@debian.org \
--cc=andrius@stikonas.eu \
--cc=gedakc@gmail.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).