From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754225AbbHNJ3b (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2015 05:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]:35415 "EHLO mail-vk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753995AbbHNJ33 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2015 05:29:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1439458366-8223-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com> <1439458366-8223-4-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com> From: David Drysdale Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:29:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 man-pages 3/3] open.2: describe O_BENEATH flag To: Michael Kerrisk-manpages Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexander Viro , Kees Cook , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Meredydd Luff , Will Drewry , Jorge Lucangeli Obes , Ricky Zhou , Lee Campbell , Julien Tinnes , Mike Depinet , James Morris , Paolo Bonzini , Paul Moore , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Linux API , linux-arch , LSM List , Linux FS Devel , fstests Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 13 August 2015 at 19:38, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:32 AM, David Drysdale wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: David Drysdale >> >> What's the behavior wrt fcntl(F_GETFL, etc)? > > I would presume that O_BENEATH is one of the so-called "file creation > flags". See this paragraph of the DESCRIPTION: > > In addition, zero or more file creation flags and file status > flags can be bitwise-or'd in flags. The file creation flags are > O_CLOEXEC, O_CREAT, O_DIRECTORY, O_EXCL, O_NOCTTY, O_NOFOLLOW, > O_TMPFILE, O_TRUNC, and O_TTY_INIT. The file status flags are > all of the remaining flags listed below. The distinction between > these two groups of flags is that the file status flags can be > retrieved and (in some cases) modified; see fcntl(2) for details. > > David, presuming this is correct (I can't see how O_BENEATH could be a > "file *status* flag"), your patch should also add O_BENEATH to the > list in that paragraph. Yeah, O_BENEATH makes sense as a file creation flag; I'll add it to that list -- thanks for spotting. > Cheers, > > Michael > > > > -- > Michael Kerrisk > Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ > Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/