From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757587Ab2JXXZo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:25:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:33304 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755602Ab2JXXZn (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:25:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121024222854.GA1891@kroah.com> References: <1351116560-6918-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@copitl.com> <20121024222854.GA1891@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:25:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] staging: tidspbridge fixes for 3.7 From: Omar Ramirez Luna To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Victor Manuel Jaquez Leal , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:09:14PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> With 3.7-rc1 changes: >> >> - New irq numbering in OMAP3 broke the driver request for a mmu irq, >> until this is migrated to the common iommu framework we can only >> hardcode the new number. >> - _raw_* accessors changed a type of one of their parameters with patch >> "195bbca ARM: 7500/1: io: avoid writeback addressing modes for >> __raw_ accessors", so the build system was filled with warnings from >> the old parameter usage. >> >> Omar Ramirez Luna (6): >> staging: tidspbridge: request the right irq for mmu >> staging: tidspbridge: drop const from custom mmu implementation >> staging: tidspbridge: change type to __iomem for per and core >> addresses >> staging: tidspbridge: ioremap dsp sync addr >> staging: tidspbridge: ioremap physical address of the stack segment >> in shm >> staging: tidspbridge: delete unused mmu functions > > Are the "fix up the compiler warning" patches really needed for 3.7? > Are they new in 3.7-rc1? Or were they there before in 3.6? All are new in 3.7-rc1. The "warning fixes" would be good to have and thought they could make it given that the change was introduced during 3.7 rc cycle. So, the warnings are not that critical. Cheers, Omar