From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758601Ab2HXKmp (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:42:45 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:53305 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752597Ab2HXKmm (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:42:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201208231814.21168.tweek@tweek.dk> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:42:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Drop support for x86-32 From: wbrana To: Ronnie Collinson Cc: Brian Gerst , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/24/12, Ronnie Collinson wrote: > Hes just told you what x32 is, if you dont understand that, you cant > understand why its not a replacement for x32_64 I know what is x32. x32 is replacement for x86-32, not x86-64.