From: 焦晓冬 <milestonejxd@gmail.com>
To: jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: POSIX violation by writeback error
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:32:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJDTihz-rFb2SGaxZsQnXGnee_2qW_ynhPe=tZ4yzQBSV_KQ1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
After reading several writeback error handling articles from LWN, I
begin to be upset about writeback error handling.
Jlayton's patch is simple but wonderful idea towards correct error
reporting. It seems one crucial thing is still here to be fixed. Does
anyone have some idea?
The crucial thing may be that a read() after a successful
open()-write()-close() may return old data.
That may happen where an async writeback error occurs after close()
and the inode/mapping get evicted before read().
That violate POSIX as POSIX requires that a read() that can be proved
to occur after a write() has returned will return the new data.
Regards,
Trol
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 6:32 焦晓冬 [this message]
2018-09-04 7:53 ` POSIX violation by writeback error Rogier Wolff
2018-09-04 8:58 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-04 9:29 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-04 10:45 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-04 11:09 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-04 14:56 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-04 15:44 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-04 16:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-04 16:23 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-04 18:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-04 20:18 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-04 20:35 ` Vito Caputo
2018-09-04 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-09-05 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2018-09-05 8:24 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-05 10:55 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-05 12:07 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-06 2:57 ` Dave Chinner
2018-09-06 9:17 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-24 23:09 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-05 13:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-05 7:08 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-05 7:39 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-05 8:04 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-05 8:37 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-05 12:07 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-09-05 12:46 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-05 9:32 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-05 7:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-05 11:42 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-05 8:09 ` 焦晓冬
2018-09-05 13:08 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-24 23:21 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-06 7:28 ` 焦晓冬
[not found] <CAJDTihx2yaR-_-9Ks1PoFcrKNZgUOoLdN-wRTTMV76Jg_dCLrw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-09-04 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-24 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-25 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-25 15:46 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-25 16:17 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-25 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-25 16:41 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-25 22:30 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-26 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-26 21:49 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-27 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2018-09-27 7:18 ` Rogier Wolff
2018-09-27 12:43 ` Jeff Layton
2018-09-27 14:27 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-25 17:35 ` Adam Borowski
2018-09-25 22:46 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJDTihz-rFb2SGaxZsQnXGnee_2qW_ynhPe=tZ4yzQBSV_KQ1g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=milestonejxd@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).