linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPc1rOyFujyWk4HwmQb6YEXd=CEHKwN8AH_pKxk-6CA08w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91f65527-3440-90fd-4096-5824fba1df78@partner.samsung.com>

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 12:03, Kamil Konieczny
<k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 10.07.2019 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 16:12, <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
> >> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
> >> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
> >> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
> >> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
> >> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
> >> move setting regulators into opp/core.
> >>
> >> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
> >>
> >> The last patch depends on two previous.
> >
> > So you break the ABI... I assume that patchset maintains
> > bisectability. However there is no explanation why ABI break is needed
> > so this does not look good...
>
> Patchset is bisectable, first one is simple and do not depends on others,
> second depends on first, last depends on first and second.
>
> What do you mean by breaking ABI ?

I mean, that Linux kernel stops working with existing DTBs... or am I
mistaken and there is no problem? Maybe I confused the order...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20190708141158eucas1p17d4b50978dbe1e5c876ce6d8f433cc95@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 k.konieczny
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190708141159eucas1p1751506975ff96a436e14940916623722@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 14:11     ` [PATCH 1/3] opp: core: add regulators enable and disable k.konieczny
2019-07-09  5:40       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-10 10:16         ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:42           ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:43         ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 13:52           ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 17:01       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-11  6:22       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-11 12:58         ` Kamil Konieczny
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190708141200eucas1p144ca3b2a5b4019aaa5773d23c0236f31@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 14:11     ` [PATCH 2/3] devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate() k.konieczny
2019-07-10 17:04       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-11 13:36         ` Kamil Konieczny
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190708141200eucas1p12bf901a2589efe92b133b357d2cbc57e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 14:11     ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 k.konieczny
2019-07-10  9:02       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-10  9:00   ` [PATCH 0/3] add " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-07-10 10:03     ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 10:14       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2019-07-10 13:51         ` Kamil Konieczny
2019-07-10 17:01           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJKOXPc1rOyFujyWk4HwmQb6YEXd=CEHKwN8AH_pKxk-6CA08w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).