From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4B8C5519F for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE33F24671 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pcBulDDV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726864AbgKQIjL (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:39:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50978 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725355AbgKQIjK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:39:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com (mail-ed1-f48.google.com [209.85.208.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87B9F2467B; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:39:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605602349; bh=Cy4GXcCCTrzvouUawUb+lUVg0c61NgYMg4LCDAnSajg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=pcBulDDViZFjtMVmHT8AROBaOm7zOqxMnlHZUfQnkAiaWRYwukO4goGfGYrfAD/5D MaP/qBQ9LcbOUjfPxBT/WYZfNC/lWwVqJUf/tt1hw4O1ryYPFlQ03LWY0kgX7k0qf3 wIT3jMvyh5RenR3wLOwPCGPob6idio6ltD0Rua80= Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id v22so21540422edt.9; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:39:09 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SDoKsohndazhyGb4F4GFm13eyYp/DLfAiOCOOsBqnBRe9Cw/J qNubWNtC0T5FWWy+4sfTEbFP6WS2cgZTPLZejMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvy7lCCxsJGnRs2AsQAgaEPb8MUllAkLTlRtx6a6g4tlOHxhV2zK5kJo+XicMxbmEMQt9ABULEMBwP46a/IFg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:31b6:: with SMTP id dj22mr20391396edb.348.1605602348036; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:39:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201117011611epcms2p22fb0315814144e94856a96014c376a04@epcms2p2> <20201117074207.GC3436@kozik-lap> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:38:56 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload To: Bongsu Jeon Cc: Bongsu Jeon , Krzysztof Opasiak , "linux-nfc@lists.01.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:14, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > 2020-11-17 16:42 GMT+09:00, krzk@kernel.org : > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > >> max_payload is unused. > > > > Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you > > with a tag, so you should include it. > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > Sorry about that. I included the tag. You need to reduce the rate of sending new patches. You sent v1. Then you sent again v1, which I reviewed. Then you send v2 without my review. So I provided a review. Then you sent again a v2 with my reviewed tags. So there are two v1 patches and two v2. Since I provided you the review tags for v2, no need to send v2 again. It confuses. Best regards, Krzysztof