From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91876C433E2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFB92080A for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:12:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599498752; bh=DPat3ZlRzIlx3pGvdlS9ov4+JwXoTqRT6aH65lpZpUw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=kfgTMehwAzYKlQmxQJlPc1LCdRW+SYTkp/3u2Z0n6u5XkaEKbeLo4O1EA+tOKvNDv df2Dolu/q4rEcBpOe8pIzLkoSEIaJz/zYVDAw4SJOCe0F3rxWYffxotXbGCpWrPBqi felytCTwEm3KV1T/wvlPX7yawEhZNiPPhTA3uQI4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730769AbgIGRMb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:12:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39298 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731183AbgIGRMM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:12:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DA43217A0; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599498731; bh=DPat3ZlRzIlx3pGvdlS9ov4+JwXoTqRT6aH65lpZpUw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=hDIxuj2XhhhEEqVgjAA3HcCmq5ToR/R66AcQtmotmjrIDZak1xnhMwZhFXqG9mJVl 7gx4HAq0nxoE/XiAVFScPLr9HnUwWyEzmXGrGcVisKN4f76KZkCiy8vk4j7HSLwCIM zLC88dGIlGzNeTM4sDs8L5lj74Oyn5DD+fXSDc78= Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c10so13404467edk.6; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305R91HP1SniJPOH1bTem9grAExEjciNUjX+7V/6HqighDmuHdT PdUIZMn73wB0QGOc2EIEL6LBB88HMaZwNRGeh9Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMyTdkAJy73PxNoZs+gNdlcqSGeh07/2bjshW3rB0M3t0yIQeyrq5QnkZWdasM4Y6BXvKIZqTmLZdf4IZC5FI= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da16:: with SMTP id r22mr23231660eds.132.1599498730074; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200907161141.31034-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200907161141.31034-3-krzk@kernel.org> <20200907173819.00005a48@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200907173819.00005a48@Huawei.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:11:57 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] dt-bindings: iio: adc: exynos-adc: require second interrupt with touch screen To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Kukjin Kim , Rob Herring , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Jonathan Bakker , =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Chmiel?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 18:39, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:11:18 +0200 > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch > > screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second > > interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens. This > > fixes dtbs_check warnings like: > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dt.yaml: adc@e1700000: interrupts: [[23], [24]] is too long > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Or I can pick this up through the IIO tree if that makes sense. > I doubt anything else will touch this binding this cycle, so either > way works for me. Let's wait for Rob's review and then if you could, please pick it up. Best regards, Krzysztof