From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753016AbdDDIXk (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 04:23:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:43206 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752560AbdDDIXg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 04:23:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170403101824.rpvkqzyigonyi77p@dell> References: <1490256207-10061-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20170328154217.5405-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20170403101824.rpvkqzyigonyi77p@dell> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:23:32 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mfd: exynos-lpass: Pinctrl dependency To: Lee Jones Cc: Linus Walleij , Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Chanwoo Choi , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> >> Hi Lee, >> >> >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any other stuff. If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work without problems because your history will contain everything needed in proper order. In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? Best regards, Krzysztof