From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933487AbbLHQXK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:23:10 -0500
Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]:33494 "EHLO
	mail-vk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933436AbbLHQXH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:23:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5666FF8F.3040005@atmel.com>
References: <24590899.3e2244jrdI@wuerfel>
	<5666FF8F.3040005@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:23:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJN_NGbpeAA-JCtfUhF+VXbXkO6dGbg+=V1Wu_C7ULvr2sN8jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix dma_addr_t printing
From: Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>> A recent patch tried to improve the printk output of the atc_dump_lli()
>> function but introduced a bug

BTW, my original patch was created for mainline and was incorrectly
applied to slave-dma.git for-linus branch (I sent Vinod an email about
that).
In that branch the code was already changed so that my patch didn't
make sense there.
Now you seem to revert the change that was originally made instead of
revering my 1 line change:) Is that intentional?

Thanks,
Dmitry