From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B669C10F0E for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFDE206B6 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="IB37whGc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727113AbfDJDi1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:38:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:44912 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726825AbfDJDi1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:38:27 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w5so1230215qtb.11 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sCy3P7ML9ZsqI83lS9uCMZFubXl5eBqHzrd0tI9mq6s=; b=IB37whGcX8y/wQ9VF6yKfaMGidEsnCIprAPgj8WlAm6SJ0SsH3IRy+HKq2UWzRD9mT 1f6xENiTyaqLwYtesCsvh47oi8KGKWpGEXNp1FfCkMwqfX2dcnWGKwpMpMJhcDaDHQ57 vUyUoBuyPYoIvfCI9D55OowZdeSM7wPvDkmnBhOygxeZVzzbcxC57ycEvkpqQ6cib6BP wxcdGDSgN6c7/nlurn0aYl10kVtw3x1aEk3lEPXchrxYf/ZYGpySmo9PKyIa8EwvGrI4 H3SV6z2GhjFViwamjHml0Xcbpf9I4K7hAvkikQcjcdnw+px0cUAmeAZjzxvpU2S644PT 6QKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sCy3P7ML9ZsqI83lS9uCMZFubXl5eBqHzrd0tI9mq6s=; b=LhWXhuyWmDbPJsohubGKGbIPJvoGxmi4a6MLK7Zgc/zMAfpEESp+Q1e1LtLw4aLyNc NTblonvxlokCmmk2/j0zOqCpOVzYLVjNzq1m4urTVi7r0O6aqMccZHo7w9IIp9yICExf u/m3oZVenTb9FSqktQJX8Wi6fPme9H8meGu3FWSpzYpI0Krmf3IdJjwyQRvZE4yPwwHW UKO0vDM9GPnNrshg6BkhREhvu/uZkfwhGtaAOaNokjQCA5iFEixaPWLqENEXpi0iGx/3 O6yJuFxq6RhcFvK1ALc7o2wqCOuno0IRdEqrqIoJ26CCLQMbjD+Lj1o6eEfdXjjJ/qxm ruoA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW8HlB0FPYof1fub0B33GTnCuFXDKqw4rrRRS/ZF9Hafx1dSDch /ebTLIux49I85qU9FRb2TBvvud//qNgI19q3B2hEvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwR8iZbBOuCHSu9wG7k7XVw8YitDiyBqiUOUtgTgDXjlYvkJzdJDlsZ6HwygGu15my2YQnWe6jieR8fWO3Alzc= X-Received: by 2002:aed:23b4:: with SMTP id j49mr33311794qtc.175.1554867506068; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:38:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190410011418.76408-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190410011418.76408-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190409223820.511e3671@oasis.local.home> <20190410024103.GA104423@google.com> <20190409224826.308b12a4@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20190409224826.308b12a4@oasis.local.home> From: Joel Fernandes Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:38:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Make srcu_struct ptr array as read-only post init To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Joel Fernandes , LKML , Paul McKenney , Kees Cook , Jessica Yu , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, "Cc: Android Kernel" , Mathieu Desnoyers , rcu@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:48 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:41:03 -0400 > Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > Other than that, the two patches look fine to me. > > > > Could I add your Reviewed-by in the respin? > > You can add an Acked-by, as I haven't spent enough time to offer a > Reviewed-by tag. ;-) > > Maybe I'll get some time to vet it a bit more tomorrow, and then > upgrade the ack to a review. > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) > Thanks! Also we could possibly consider adding the tracepoint ptrs array as well to the list, which would be useful I think, if one were to over write that array by accident (and the bpf tps related array too). - Joel