From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753151AbdF2Ui5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:38:57 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:34167 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896AbdF2Ui4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:38:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3wyzKL1g2Vz9s65@ozlabs.org> References: <20170614130241.19865-2-npiggin@gmail.com> <3wyzKL1g2Vz9s65@ozlabs.org> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:38:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HB_GgHszpNEi-ychG-CZjIwY6SY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev , "Gautham R . Shenoy" , Linux PM , Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:02:39 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could >> take significant amount of processing time. The idle process >> should set its polling flag before this, so another process that >> wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI. >> >> Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible. >> >> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin > > Series applied to powerpc next, thanks. > > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3fc5ee927ff4ffed6aa2fcd44d2fbf OK I've applied it too, so I guess I should drop it? Thanks, Rafael