linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:01:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gQ2RCZGo03=7DoUAxw86wSEaXdnJ2KtknU3uUtXCqmvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809023445.xn3mlv5qxjgz6bpp@vireshk-i7>

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:34 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 23-07-19, 11:44, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
> > requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.
> >
> > Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
> > for ppc_cbe_cpufreq driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c     | 19 +++++-
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h     |  8 +++
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> -------------------------8<-------------------------

If you do it this way, Patchwork will not pick up the patch.

Please send afresh with "[Update]" or bumped up version number in the
subject (or both).

> From b84e1c119d63ab842c9e4f3acbc3aec22efa866d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <b84e1c119d63ab842c9e4f3acbc3aec22efa866d.1565318034.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:49:48 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: Switch to QoS requests instead of
>  cpufreq notifier
>
> The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
> requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.
>
> Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
> for ppc_cbe_cpufreq driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

And here you can say that it replaces an earlier patch.

> ---
> - dev_pm_qos_update_request() can return 1 on success
>  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c     | 19 +++++-
>  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h     |  8 +++
>  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> index b83f36febf03..c58abb4cca3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,13 @@ static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  #endif
>
>         policy->freq_table = cbe_freqs;
> +       cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(policy);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +       cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(policy);
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = {
>         .verify         = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>         .target_index   = cbe_cpufreq_target,
>         .init           = cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init,
> +       .exit           = cbe_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
>         .name           = "cbe-cpufreq",
>         .flags          = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
>  };
> @@ -139,15 +147,24 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = {
>
>  static int __init cbe_cpufreq_init(void)
>  {
> +       int ret;
> +
>         if (!machine_is(cell))
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> -       return cpufreq_register_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver);
> +       cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init();
> +
> +       ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver);
> +       if (ret)
> +               cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit();
> +
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static void __exit cbe_cpufreq_exit(void)
>  {
>         cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver);
> +       cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit();
>  }
>
>  module_init(cbe_cpufreq_init);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h
> index 9d973519d669..00cd8633b0d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ int cbe_cpufreq_set_pmode_pmi(int cpu, unsigned int pmode);
>
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_CBE_PMI)
>  extern bool cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi;
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void);
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void);
>  #else
>  #define cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi (0)
> +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) {}
> +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) {}
> +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void) {}
> +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void) {}
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> index 97c8ee4614b7..bc9dd30395c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/timer.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/prom.h>
> @@ -24,8 +25,6 @@
>
>  #include "ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h"
>
> -static u8 pmi_slow_mode_limit[MAX_CBE];
> -
>  bool cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = false;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi);
>
> @@ -65,64 +64,89 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_set_pmode_pmi);
>
>  static void cbe_cpufreq_handle_pmi(pmi_message_t pmi_msg)
>  {
> +       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +       struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
>         u8 node, slow_mode;
> +       int cpu, ret;
>
>         BUG_ON(pmi_msg.type != PMI_TYPE_FREQ_CHANGE);
>
>         node = pmi_msg.data1;
>         slow_mode = pmi_msg.data2;
>
> -       pmi_slow_mode_limit[node] = slow_mode;
> +       cpu = cbe_node_to_cpu(node);
>
>         pr_debug("cbe_handle_pmi: node: %d max_freq: %d\n", node, slow_mode);
> -}
> -
> -static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -                                      unsigned long event, void *data)
> -{
> -       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> -       struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs = policy->freq_table;
> -       u8 node;
> -
> -       /* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY
> -        * policy events?)
> -        */
> -       node = cbe_cpu_to_node(policy->cpu);
> -
> -       pr_debug("got notified, event=%lu, node=%u\n", event, node);
>
> -       if (pmi_slow_mode_limit[node] != 0) {
> -               pr_debug("limiting node %d to slow mode %d\n",
> -                        node, pmi_slow_mode_limit[node]);
> +       policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +       if (!policy) {
> +               pr_warn("cpufreq policy not found cpu%d\n", cpu);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
> -               cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0,
> +       req = policy->driver_data;
>
> -                       cbe_freqs[pmi_slow_mode_limit[node]].frequency);
> -       }
> +       ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(req,
> +                       policy->freq_table[slow_mode].frequency);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: %d\n", ret);
> +       else
> +               pr_debug("limiting node %d to slow mode %d\n", node, slow_mode);
>
> -       return 0;
> +       cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  }
>
> -static struct notifier_block pmi_notifier_block = {
> -       .notifier_call = pmi_notifier,
> -};
> -
>  static struct pmi_handler cbe_pmi_handler = {
>         .type                   = PMI_TYPE_FREQ_CHANGE,
>         .handle_pmi_message     = cbe_cpufreq_handle_pmi,
>  };
>
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +       struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi)
> +               return;
> +
> +       req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!req)
> +               return;
> +
> +       ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu), req,
> +                                    DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY,
> +                                    policy->freq_table[0].frequency);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint (%d)\n", ret);
> +               kfree(req);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
> +       policy->driver_data = req;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init);
>
> -static int __init cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void)
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> -       cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = pmi_register_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler) == 0;
> +       struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = policy->driver_data;
>
> -       if (!cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> +       if (cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi) {
> +               dev_pm_qos_remove_request(req);
> +               kfree(req);
> +       }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit);
>
> -       cpufreq_register_notifier(&pmi_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void)
> +{
> +       if (!pmi_register_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler))
> +               cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init);
>
> -       return 0;
> +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void)
> +{
> +       pmi_unregister_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler);
> +       cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = false;
>  }
> -device_initcall(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-09  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-23  6:14 [PATCH V2 00/10] cpufreq: Migrate users of policy notifiers to QoS requests Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] powerpc: macintosh: " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: " Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  2:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  9:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-08-19  2:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-19  6:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-19  6:47           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-10 12:19     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] ACPI: cpufreq: " Viresh Kumar
2019-08-05  9:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  4:39     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-06  8:01       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  8:47         ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  2:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-10 12:13             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-28  8:50   ` [PATCH V3 " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY Viresh Kumar
2019-07-25 13:36   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] video: sa1100fb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] video: pxafb: " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier events Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] Documentation: cpufreq: Update policy notifier documentation Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gQ2RCZGo03=7DoUAxw86wSEaXdnJ2KtknU3uUtXCqmvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).