From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B9FC43613 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB1E2083D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:00:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1561366858; bh=R7jizqBodk35AO7xIq2o5Wq/JRXWrVWaNMQtKUKjKlY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=bjTD4aXaYeV+On+4cMDHwOoFd9xF1hbtOvjlq3tIj49X8Wuak94rDeckho+NNtJOe XW2iEySJXEJZmjg9gwot4/NbsvBX92R0LUM0Y2eKoAhaMDkF8wlrv7M9x0ehjuM9Hx u0Q65H7LeyG7S4RpdrJ2TfqmeV7OjWv4Ty4SC/KE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728137AbfFXJA4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:00:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:44409 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726557AbfFXJA4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:00:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b7so12700351otl.11; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:00:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R7jizqBodk35AO7xIq2o5Wq/JRXWrVWaNMQtKUKjKlY=; b=Aksw2oc5yKJmgo6Gn23nuOuNyUkAZgMcco4jzOXQlXUvatKUdDZZJvzU9OZgq9mHmC XsCoo67cGnIYbKmq4GuspQdgzTgGQ8pdCc01pMJ5PfE/FsN1ydy/+/fC8XU5OfR4DKrB ILuW/Mh89TAkRjsu55htj+qBrdVrfITKG98kZGsIIYaYp/MrL+Tl9Io6/7VZn1jVB6Fn O9BT0KRD9RDgii6A71zTWsd3cXxrEHXWY6OajBWtubh27yWjTl/kGk3cO+qsbObEsV2V 0cSkzZHqMgKd3u5HSd5OvenBDP13apzTqWuzkdxIiwVIWTriIqMEoYSCOLHfAYFeFV2C u6HA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUC+EwW5IKTS6DAPMegMtpoyJBoDToJonzoGDwUlD9LoVjh3nEJ /d1T8QU1vONgNfmzsF3k4f7zwRzW0/V8dOXiBrr6BA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZFrprMjOc/bF3rfscGOpj2DfeISakHXB5J1GJSpy0R3KafyBqp7yG2KxBQ+8KKJM/OnSXzLjK9/oIbK+FCek= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1516:: with SMTP id k22mr23006277otp.189.1561366855737; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:00:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190621132302.30414-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <0ce0d1ca-154d-fca3-f739-573ecbd2b0db@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <0ce0d1ca-154d-fca3-f739-573ecbd2b0db@linaro.org> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:00:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Viresh Kumar , Eduardo Valentin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi Viresh, > > On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED > > is trying to avoid. > > > > Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > > what about this one? Care to respond to my question regarding this one in the first place, please?