From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753111AbeE3LKD (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 07:10:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f195.google.com ([74.125.82.195]:39869 "EHLO mail-ot0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753083AbeE3LJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 07:09:58 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKL30mLNCVTto4WM7YSs4cExlu/PB6B+jQt0a3Dz0D2S3NyFguPVRGH5iOksKgBX/qBGj6xD1cMpBOmy0XHN9Xg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180529172611.GL3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180525101958.13277-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180525101958.13277-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180529120443.GE3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180529172611.GL3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 13:09:57 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5CPAlLTxgbqEtMLfSN3Ed2GlW14 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer To: Paul McKenney Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney >> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior >> >> wrote: >> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four >> >> > possible notifier types, that are: >> >> > ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD() >> >> > BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD() >> >> > RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD() >> >> > >> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it >> >> > complete. >> >> > >> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior >> >> >> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul. >> > >> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the >> > SRCU piece: >> > >> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney >> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney >> >> Thanks! >> >> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then. > > Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove > them from -rcu. I've just added them to my linux-next branch. Cheers, Rafael