From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752107AbcFWNSb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:38376 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751188AbcFWNSa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:18:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160623131641.GF27263@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20160623075515.GB239751@worksta> <20160623131641.GF27263@kuha.fi.intel.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:18:27 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: u5rWRHoq8O0_0AkesEsxdrbzDgY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] acpi/pmic: add opregion driver for Intel BXT WhiskeyCove PMIC To: Heikki Krogerus Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bin Gao , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Aaron Lu , Paul Gortmaker , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ysiyer , Ajay Thomas , Bin Gao , Felipe Balbi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 03:03:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Bin Gao wrote: >> > This series modifies the pen function signature to take bit field >> > and adds a new opregion driver for Intel BXT WhiskeyCove PMIC. It >> > also adds support for PMIC regs operation region. >> > >> > Yegnesh Iyer (1): >> > acpi: pmic: Modifying the pen function signature to take bit field >> > >> > Ajay Thomas (1): >> > acpi: pmic: Add opregion driver for Intel BXT WhiskeyCove PMIC >> >> I've just applied the above two patches from the previous series. Are >> there any changes to them here? >> >> > Chandra Sekhar Anagani (1): >> > acpi: pmic: Add support for PMIC regs operation region >> >> That's a new one I suppose? >> >> How is this related to http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=146660742815070&w=2 ? > > Looks the like same to me.. Just ignore the one I send then. I will. What about the second patch in your series? > Sorry, there seems to have been a miscommunication somewhere. I see, no problem.