linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:47:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gs3FnCgFS8rg7vwCeATJKfR+mfMVrpkTbM237XVhpDJQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1547197612.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:18 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This commit introduces the frequency constraint infrastructure, which
> provides a generic interface for parts of the kernel to constraint the
> working frequency range of a device.
>
> The primary users of this are the cpufreq and devfreq frameworks. The
> cpufreq framework already implements such constraints with help of
> notifier chains (for thermal and other constraints) and some local code
> (for user-space constraints). The devfreq framework developers have also
> shown interest [1] in such a framework, which may use it at a later
> point of time.
>
> The idea here is to provide a generic interface and get rid of the
> notifier based mechanism.
>
> Only one constraint is added for now for the cpufreq framework and the
> rest will follow after this stuff is merged.
>
> Matthias Kaehlcke was involved in the preparation of the first draft of
> this work and so I have added him as Co-author to the first patch.
> Thanks Matthias.
>
> FWIW, This doesn't have anything to do with the boot-constraints
> framework [2] I was trying to upstream earlier :)

This is quite a bit of code to review, so it will take some time.

One immediate observation is that it seems to do quite a bit of what
is done in the PM QoS framework, so maybe there is an opportunity for
some consolidation in there.

Cheers,
Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-11  9:18 [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure Viresh Kumar
2019-01-11  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] drivers: base: Add frequency " Viresh Kumar
2019-01-18  1:03   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-18 10:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-18 22:45       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-22  7:09         ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-22 17:50           ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-11  9:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Implement freq-constraint callback Viresh Kumar
2019-01-18  1:46   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-18  1:49     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-11  9:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Implement USER constraint Viresh Kumar
2019-01-11  9:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-01-17 13:16   ` [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure Juri Lelli
2019-01-17 14:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-18 12:39       ` Juri Lelli
2019-01-21 11:10         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-22 19:30           ` Matthias Kaehlcke
     [not found]           ` <CA+mqd+7EqERei8eekAsVxa_bJUYETyO3T76L8Q_sV=C9rwiy3g@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-28 14:04             ` Qais Yousef
2019-01-30  5:27               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30  5:25     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-02-08  9:08       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-02-08  9:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-02-08  9:53     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-08 10:23       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-02-08 10:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-11  5:43           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0gs3FnCgFS8rg7vwCeATJKfR+mfMVrpkTbM237XVhpDJQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).