linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Simon Schricker <sschricker@suse.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / arch: x86: Rework the MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS handling
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:06:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hBRXhQqqXp4wSe+EJNcsJRN5knx0DONnc5UTa+601mug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322142828.GA12472@zn.tnic>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:28 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:18:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > The current handling of MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS in the kernel is
> > problematic, because it may cause changes made by user space to that
> > MSR (with the help of the x86_energy_perf_policy tool, for example)
>
> One more reason to control MSR accesses from userspace. I'm working on
> a series to even completely forbid accesses to some MSRs over /dev/msr
> so I think accessing MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS solely over the new
> interface in patch 2 would be much better.
>
> So, you're carrying those and you'd like to have an ACK from me?
>
> Btw, a couple of nitpicks below.
>
> > Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> ...
>
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, saved_epb);
> > +
> > +#define EPB_MASK     0x0fULL
> > +#define EPB_SAVED    0x10ULL
> > +
> > +static int intel_epb_save(void)
>
> I'd drop that "intel_epb_" prefix from those static functions, but your
> call...

They help indexing tools (elixir.bootlin.com and similar) a bit, so
I'd rather retain them.

> > +{
> > +     u64 epb;
> > +
> > +     rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
> > +     /*
> > +      * Ensure that saved_epb will always be nonzero after this write even if
> > +      * the EPB value read from the MSR is 0.
> > +      */
> > +     this_cpu_write(saved_epb, (epb & EPB_MASK) | EPB_SAVED);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_epb.rst
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_epb.rst
>
> WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1
> #345: FILE: Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_epb.rst:1:

Well, this is documentation, so ...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 22:12 [PATCH 0/2] PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS handling fixes and sysfs i/f Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-21 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / arch: x86: Rework the MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22  9:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-22 14:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-22 14:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-22 14:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-22 16:12         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-22 16:52           ` Joe Perches
2019-03-25 10:06     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-03-22 16:27   ` Thomas Renninger
2019-03-22 16:43     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 11:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / arch: x86: MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22  9:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-22 14:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 10:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22 15:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-25  9:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 11:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 10:23   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-05-09 17:18     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 17:43       ` Ido Schimmel
2019-05-09 21:28         ` [PATCH] x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-10  6:01           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-27 10:56         ` [PATCH] x86: intel_epb: Do not build when CONFIG_PM is unset Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-30  7:47           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hBRXhQqqXp4wSe+EJNcsJRN5knx0DONnc5UTa+601mug@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sschricker@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).