From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753238AbdHGL5Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:57:25 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:33917 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753092AbdHGL5X (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:57:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170807084956.4kxkb2y7yxxi4ivw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1912685.WjJGzNPQ5e@aspire.rjw.lan> <3267088.f3JVtvJoiF@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170807084956.4kxkb2y7yxxi4ivw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:57:21 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pT_CSLT52KtdnRhDplpoMsFZHWQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM / s2idle: Rename PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE to PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , LKML , Linux ACPI , Thomas Gleixner , Srinivas Pandruvada , Jacob Pan , Len Brown , Daniel Lezcano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> To make it clear that the symbol in question refers to >> suspend-to-idle, rename it from PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE to >> PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >> --- >> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 - >> drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 2 - >> include/linux/suspend.h | 4 +-- >> kernel/power/suspend.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> kernel/power/suspend_test.c | 4 +-- >> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> >> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/suspend.h >> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h >> @@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ static inline void pm_restore_console(vo >> typedef int __bitwise suspend_state_t; >> >> #define PM_SUSPEND_ON ((__force suspend_state_t) 0) >> -#define PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1) >> +#define PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1) >> #define PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY ((__force suspend_state_t) 2) >> #define PM_SUSPEND_MEM ((__force suspend_state_t) 3) > > I feel something like PM_SUSPEND_IDLE is more consistent with the > existing PM_SUSPEND_MEM. Also the proposed PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE has > 'SUSPEND' in it twice, so at the very least it should be > PM_SUSPEND_2IDLE :-) > > >> -#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE >> +#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE >> #define PM_SUSPEND_MAX ((__force suspend_state_t) 4) OK, I can call it PM_SUSPEND_IDLE no problem.