linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Binding <sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
	MANAGEM..."  <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] platform/x86: serial-multi-instantiate: Reorganize I2C functions
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:27:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hGviZkciBx5pc2bP6yJfHi4_gOuBj7+exVfPaXCZvuvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220121143254.6432-7-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com>

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:33 PM Stefan Binding
<sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
>
> From: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
>
> Reorganize I2C functions to accommodate SPI support
> Split the probe and factor out parts of the code
> that will be used in the SPI support
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Binding <sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c   | 145 +++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> index 32fb3f904547..162ec20a861a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> @@ -29,96 +29,131 @@ struct smi_instance {
>
>  struct smi {
>         int i2c_num;
> -       struct i2c_client *i2c_devs[];
> +       struct i2c_client **i2c_devs;
>  };
>
> -static int smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int smi_get_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev,
> +                      const struct smi_instance *inst)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       switch (inst->flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE) {
> +       case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
> +               ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, inst->irq_idx);
> +               break;
> +       case IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC:
> +               ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, inst->irq_idx);
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               ret = 0;
> +               break;

return 0;

would be slightly more efficient here

> +       }
> +
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Error requesting irq at index %d: %d\n",
> +                             inst->irq_idx, ret);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void smi_devs_unregister(struct smi *smi)
> +{
> +       while (smi->i2c_num > 0)
> +               i2c_unregister_device(smi->i2c_devs[--smi->i2c_num]);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * smi_i2c_probe - Instantiate multiple I2C devices from inst array
> + * @pdev:      Platform device
> + * @adev:      ACPI device
> + * @smi:       Internal struct for Serial multi instantiate driver
> + * @inst:      Array of instances to probe

This is called inst_array below.

> + *
> + * Returns the number of I2C devices instantiate, Zero if none is found or a negative error code.
> + */
> +static int smi_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev, struct smi *smi,
> +                        const struct smi_instance *inst_array)
>  {
>         struct i2c_board_info board_info = {};
> -       const struct smi_instance *inst;
>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -       struct acpi_device *adev;
> -       struct smi *smi;
>         char name[32];
> -       int i, ret;
> +       int i, ret, count;
>
> -       inst = device_get_match_data(dev);
> -       if (!inst) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "Error ACPI match data is missing\n");
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -       }
> -
> -       adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> -
> -       /* Count number of clients to instantiate */
>         ret = i2c_acpi_client_count(adev);
> -       if (ret < 0)
> -               return ret;
> +       if (ret <= 0)
> +               return ret == 0 ? -ENODEV : ret;

I would prefer

if ret < 0)
        return ret;
else if (!ret)
        return -ENODEV;

>
> -       smi = devm_kmalloc(dev, struct_size(smi, i2c_devs, ret), GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!smi)
> -               return -ENOMEM;
> +       count = ret;
>
> -       smi->i2c_num = ret;
> +       smi->i2c_devs = devm_kcalloc(dev, count, sizeof(*smi->i2c_devs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!smi->i2c_devs)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < smi->i2c_num && inst[i].type; i++) {
> +       for (i = 0; i < count && inst_array[i].type; i++) {
>                 memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));
> -               strlcpy(board_info.type, inst[i].type, I2C_NAME_SIZE);
> -               snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s.%d", dev_name(dev), inst[i].type, i);
> +               strscpy(board_info.type, inst_array[i].type, I2C_NAME_SIZE);

The switch-over from strlcpy() to strscpy() should be mentioned in the
changelog.

> +               snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s.%d", dev_name(dev), inst_array[i].type, i);
>                 board_info.dev_name = name;
> -               switch (inst[i].flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE) {
> -               case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
> -                       ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, inst[i].irq_idx);
> -                       if (ret < 0) {
> -                               dev_err(dev, "Error requesting irq at index %d: %d\n",
> -                                               inst[i].irq_idx, ret);
> -                               goto error;
> -                       }
> -                       board_info.irq = ret;
> -                       break;
> -               case IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC:
> -                       ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, inst[i].irq_idx);
> -                       if (ret < 0) {
> -                               dev_dbg(dev, "Error requesting irq at index %d: %d\n",
> -                                       inst[i].irq_idx, ret);
> -                               goto error;
> -                       }
> -                       board_info.irq = ret;
> -                       break;
> -               default:
> -                       board_info.irq = 0;
> -                       break;
> -               }
> +
> +               ret = smi_get_irq(pdev, adev, &inst_array[i]);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto error;
> +               board_info.irq = ret;
> +
>                 smi->i2c_devs[i] = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, i, &board_info);
>                 if (IS_ERR(smi->i2c_devs[i])) {
>                         ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(smi->i2c_devs[i]),
>                                             "Error creating i2c-client, idx %d\n", i);
>                         goto error;
>                 }
> +               smi->i2c_num++;
>         }
> -       if (i < smi->i2c_num) {
> +       if (smi->i2c_num < count) {
>                 dev_err(dev, "Error finding driver, idx %d\n", i);

That's not particularly informative and so not particularly useful for
a casual receiver of this message.  I'd make it dev_dbg().

>                 ret = -ENODEV;
>                 goto error;
>         }
>
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smi);
> -       return 0;
> +       dev_info(dev, "Instantiated %d I2C devices.\n", smi->i2c_num);
>
> +       return 0;
>  error:
> -       while (--i >= 0)
> -               i2c_unregister_device(smi->i2c_devs[i]);
> +       smi_devs_unregister(smi);
>
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       const struct smi_instance *inst_array;
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +       struct acpi_device *adev;
> +       struct smi *smi;
> +
> +       inst_array = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +       if (!inst_array) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Error ACPI match data is missing\n");

Again, this isn't very informative to someone reading this message on
a random system, so I'd change the log level.

> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +
> +       adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> +       if (!adev)
> +               return -ENODEV;

Since you're at it anyway, I'd check the companion's presence upfront,
because you can't do much without it in any case.

> +
> +       smi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*smi), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!smi)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smi);
> +
> +       return smi_i2c_probe(pdev, adev, smi, inst_array);
> +}
> +
>  static int smi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct smi *smi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -       int i;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < smi->i2c_num; i++)
> -               i2c_unregister_device(smi->i2c_devs[i]);
> +       smi_devs_unregister(smi);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 14:32 [PATCH v5 0/9] Support Spi in i2c-multi-instantiate driver Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] spi: Make spi_alloc_device and spi_add_device public again Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] spi: Create helper API to lookup ACPI info for spi device Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] spi: Support selection of the index of the ACPI Spi Resource before alloc Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] spi: Add API to count spi acpi resources Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Rename it for a generic serial driver name Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 15:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] platform/x86: serial-multi-instantiate: Reorganize I2C functions Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 15:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] platform/x86: serial-multi-instantiate: Add SPI support Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 15:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-21 16:55     ` Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 17:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-26 15:19         ` Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] ALSA: hda/realtek: Add support for HP Laptops Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 14:44   ` Takashi Iwai
2022-01-21 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CS35L41 Stefan Binding
2022-01-21 16:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hGviZkciBx5pc2bP6yJfHi4_gOuBj7+exVfPaXCZvuvg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).