From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: 100 ms boot time increase regression in acpi_init()/acpi_scan_bus()
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hyp1nR5id02abZh4cjw=sT0J_nf9spbUHfuwzjdJb5KA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31603144-edec-df2d-fb46-283692c67420@leemhuis.info>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:03 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
>
> Top-posting for once, to make this easy accessible to everyone.
>
> @Rafael or any other @acpi/@pm developer: what's the status here?
> Neither in this thread nor in the bug ticket anything happened afaics.
> Or is a 100ms boot time increase considered "not a regression"?
It is on my list of things to look into, because it used to work
faster, so depending on what change made it work slower, it may be
possible to restore the previous performance without sacrificing too
much.
I honestly don't think that it is a noticeable issue for users in the
field, though.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 11:29 100 ms boot time increase regression in acpi_init()/acpi_scan_bus() Paul Menzel
2022-01-31 7:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-01-31 22:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-08 12:03 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-02-08 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0hyp1nR5id02abZh4cjw=sT0J_nf9spbUHfuwzjdJb5KA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).