From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37350C43387 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F219D217D4 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:22:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1546870923; bh=lnDSYHGN6rNIJSR/c7EGks0FRT405XLrP6bjK6hOHyg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=UX+Q5Y0g21hokFyjDrmiUIVqPm2HiM/hVxtNRqrTQBOFbCqWqSDjiIkumJnw7v/dl iz0teNCXMfxvMZFUhY5Dl/7ZA2kXykoEVgNrwvTbh9QIIMYBHuu81CdorZ1iFnp7+6 LAIy09ev9mcO08tYUqHqRVrcyMCyUxs3AeRmMlC4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727880AbfAGOWC (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:22:02 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:33821 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726827AbfAGOWB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:22:01 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id t5so451748otk.1; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 06:22:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lnDSYHGN6rNIJSR/c7EGks0FRT405XLrP6bjK6hOHyg=; b=I/sMH969Rih5ajkde/7CkNUwfV3OIMqvj7hWeti0yW4ZAzw9BGaRgsW1FZ4Q2AD/gg o8XN8l7sk3vBm7dQGI3PriWDYcGn3G7ZDX6b/aavdxR9+wybxYH96o+iDbgy4OVZfmGG rH0GhhUWY4YKelqiqo5RsU7LiiGDIB2ncdRrtFGrUjrlYVp9B56k7jN+TSVqMVbPNby5 S4C5beDqaxHbYyxJM0kvv+U5hqj2VRMmIMttzsq/Ok4drQ/2nTg2Ki/urz13UnP5GjfU pW4+Hf0KN9AlWcnyIdw1EbsRLkq2icbUXNY3GK67w8EaazrI3YGK5wcy4Ytzk0xpvOMC ptWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfxRWhz9VIOM8LggYfeBzV8glGnN4cCRfA2Hz9srWGK/Qm96wL9 2GR/lpAjHrCvAcqFLSrcCtdQ1x94AJXE5QXz1tc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4fWEHeL7jYMpoON+5ytbUBEDCKoiPVBJUfaziPIhJvzKznL9lgh+LdnOxcAxi/KM+vTlPBb0RJ6RhpSzhYPnI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5e8c:: with SMTP id f12mr45432271otl.343.1546870921008; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 06:22:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1545388436-7489-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1545388436-7489-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:21:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915: Move on the new pm runtime interface To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin , "open list:THERMAL" , linux-kernel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Thara Gopinath , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, David Airlie , "Intel graphics driver community testing & development" , dri-devel , Ulf Hansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM Vincent Guittot wrote: > > Hi Tvrtko, > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 13:32, Tvrtko Ursulin > wrote: > > > > > > On 21/12/2018 13:26, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Tvrtko Ursulin > > [snip] > > > >> > > >> If it is always monotonic, then worst case we report one wrong sample, > > >> which I guess is still not ideal since someone could be querying the PMU > > >> with quite low frequency. > > >> > > >> There are tests which probably can hit this, but to run them > > >> automatically your patches would need to be rebased on drm-tip and maybe > > >> sent to our trybot. I can do that after the holiday break if you are > > >> okay with having the series waiting until then. > > > > > > yes looks good to me > > > > Looks good to me as well. And our CI agrees with it. So: > > > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Thanks for the review and the test > > > > > I assume you will take the patch through some power related tree and we > > will eventually pull it back to drm-tip. > > Rafael, > How do you want to proceed with this patch and the 2 others of the serie ? I'm going to queue up the whole series for 5.1. Thanks!