From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5C1C64EBC for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F0A213A2 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:32:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B1F0A213A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727655AbeJDQZR (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:25:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:38259 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727150AbeJDQZR (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:25:17 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id h15-v6so8493007otj.5; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 02:32:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vttIPmW6bRPFnjF4MnucHltErxDXz5XftYR6jv18fpg=; b=pwkrDwQ7YXVuETR68f1ElCRn3qqkTF6Ry1n7EJNCb0uEQjEPj+u/PcNgfRIQ8v3/bS 0GKnmWbkoTUFeKHZJvqJacqyT085QJgu/b8EJbyiF1IUSHdZq7A0dkojC/Z/Y36nGT12 MnXcBpiLnsLuJ8vbn4LMCsqX1vszRmBkoIrUj29BBU13rT63Xnk4qbFr/NewW/yX/A8T qvTaTVcfPH4B7J7cEsLx2v30IYTKrXf9tNmT86FI0psmVH+hsxS9vGB9mtYeI5MDu+7v fLK69+QsCf2yVzBO5J5/R2Ev7ZN8WczIAi1b71/1BzVPjzX1dyQ9zRX4FO9W2J8D32O1 9Sqw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfog9GyYG0aN4xPWgfaGwE37Gm0fGSIJnEUlLTrzOXFmbsYAQx803 klF7KQ9kpig9BoG+mcYjmawiXlDVUkFfe7HHpVc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61HvPLPCRxXN2OTA4toFy1xmgIC+vRm5yDXpz5nKAdubGHi4mU2aIUtnD0fay/i3eWx67l7Ir5SPS3FURER5JU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:34f:: with SMTP id 73mr3353641otv.343.1538645572909; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 02:32:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181003143824.13059-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:32:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Daniel Lezcano , Linux PM , Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman , Lina Iyer , Rob Herring , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > >> > > >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat > > >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I > > >> have a plan for how to move forward. > > >> > > >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided > > >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete > > >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, > > >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. > > >> > > >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's > > >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. > > > > > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I > > > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that? > > > > Yes, please. > > > > > > > > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the > > > PSCI-related ones need ACKs. > > > > For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more. > > > > Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed. > > > > Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack > > from Daniel) > > OK, thanks. > > Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3? I don't see any dependency there, so I'll queue up the 1-3 in pm-domains and the 4-6 in pm-cpuidle. Thanks, Rafael