From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49174C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D4323B03 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730685AbgLHROs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:14:48 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-f66.google.com ([209.85.161.66]:36016 "EHLO mail-oo1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729374AbgLHROs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:14:48 -0500 Received: by mail-oo1-f66.google.com with SMTP id j8so56689oon.3; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:14:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yjn7ENoQqrYSXRLrl/wMY90f6nn1P7GX4qELPCsk/Y8=; b=UmW3rj95Llnp/GCbgEuBpCxxLRDbwOwsKZE/TorI4DmPVGL46spBQShuc/MBSJ8wcL f8QRyxwRTuJ5KeUJnWBWDPgtpYG4wVbA4iKmJV8J7WMW/SWblRpZKnyraYs5vsqShm4R s00DuAEwG10leu7PRJsLEl5aDtYQCLce9RsxMydykoG1oNgGZUdAeER5s67szmTD5sBL /Qi11PbHVRg9Wg2IsW4G14tx2G/wldN4etazEk+iUsdnfE5RjQQQwf5/uLV2LDNXouMZ e76QYd33C/l3cck7cJcCgQx+uCK3AQS3siSTHXo++8B7/0XvabekiJ3qtT5TI1BZ4m8X ijYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CaZq9Vmqa6bhjYZTD+1XKIRWLE0a4CYEvMGO/ywsL/a8ykym9 /ig0zDDEf3jdBjYIoq4vkz2PFKo8SemzJusBK+XDT9+k X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJZiKtd9SkK9eAON4ljKf2z7jyUuSwud6szg2JQ/ZXGtiaB9MuLKsISoRl57PElSyUAw3KqefS3Jb8EMMPqPg= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9873:: with SMTP id z48mr3338555ooi.44.1607447646975; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:14:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20360841.iInq7taT2Z@kreacher> <1607445035.2673.64.camel@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <1607445035.2673.64.camel@suse.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:13:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor To: Giovanni Gherdovich Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , LKML , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Pandruvada , Peter Zijlstra , Doug Smythies Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:31 PM Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 17:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is based on the RFC posted a few days ago: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1817571.2o5Kk4Ohv2@kreacher/ > > > > The majority of the original cover letter still applies, so let me quote it > > here: > > [...] > > Hello Rafael, > > I'd like to test this patch, as I have concerns on how it performs against the > current intel_pstate passive + HWP + schedutil (which leaves HWP.REQ.DESIRED > untouched). The performance will be worse in some cases, which is to be expected, but the point here is to counter the problem that in some cases the frequency is excessive now. > I'll get results within a week. Do you mind holding back the merge until then? Sure, the series is still under review.