From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D561CC43334 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1422083D for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:06:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C1422083D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728303AbeIFNk2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:40:28 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:35639 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727951AbeIFNk1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:40:27 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f65.google.com with SMTP id m11-v6so19162883oic.2; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V70Q4ZLLcaibRVB7EYsFSnYCRxkAB7V7OnzE3w66NZ4=; b=azQKpzWMB/c+zGAUrr1ysy0DoOd67Lz6tS8gmNnLIOCMall8qnnmxqzmEhg3pz1a2s ZYZtQSGTVe/qwkcaa71qGgnf+HvA4aGU62s8PhkteYX14VLf8colEwOS0nwOtg9nwTTX +Pt48jgsnP9BAcw/IGOakyFEuU2iCTX/RYfCNoHxaw3G4AaczurNneMticYbJLPP+/dm sA7QSJqIGYNbZJVoTQyCzULQM0Vij0YhNJV6jDumRsfsCMsknlr1AINsc54apcO7acuG ghKuckb7KclNsUNoxCU3cMFCr4koob8uUq9nYJzQHFDG1avMrs0fx6k8Bp+dL4RElvxz 7Utg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51B7oFB8/ZE3Loy+Gq0FdpHl55MLl+IwZFzvGxftkgVFHcRFCRpL b/rcgEfvVTyZsOQ2ntamGfNYS5ftbL/SIxDn83Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZGoaLAblg4BOQtXYWiEtzoFm34bhRX3ppE+VG7vZCGo1VhEO+N1fN4DqSSW84lqBTspkN3jHlKNA4DcB98InE= X-Received: by 2002:aca:b844:: with SMTP id i65-v6mr1941082oif.177.1536224759848; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 02:05:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1533875532-24954-1-git-send-email-okaya@kernel.org> <20180905212028.GS107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20180905212028.GS107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/ACPI: correct error message for ASPM disabling To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: okaya@kernel.org, Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:20 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:32:11AM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > If _OSC execution fails today for platforms without an _OSC > > entry, code is printing a misleading message saying disabling > > ASPM as follows: > > > > acpi PNP0A03:00: _OSC failed (AE_NOT_FOUND); disabling ASPM > > > > We need to ensure that platform supports ASPM to begin with. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya > > Reported-by: Michael Kelley > > Tentatively applied both to pci/aspm for v4.20, thanks! > > Rafael, let me know if you object or would rather put these through your tree. I have no problems with these and they can go in via the PCI tree as far as I'm concerned. Thanks, Rafael